运筹与管理
運籌與管理
운주여관리
OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
2014年
5期
101-108
,共8页
许垒%卜祥智%冯立攀%李春发
許壘%蔔祥智%馮立攀%李春髮
허루%복상지%풍립반%리춘발
海运服务链%运力定价%空箱调运责任%成本分摊策略
海運服務鏈%運力定價%空箱調運責任%成本分攤策略
해운복무련%운력정개%공상조운책임%성본분탄책략
sea-cargo service chain%capacity pricing%empty container repositioning responsibility%cost sharing policy
本文研究了单个承运商和两个货运代理在双向港口间提供往返货运服务的航运服务链。由于港口间货运需求的内在不平衡,货运公司在多港口间的空箱调运会产生巨大的空箱调运费用。分别构建了承运商承担和承运商与货运代理共同承担空箱调运的数学模型,通过数学模型和数值算例分析了不同市场条件下的空箱调运责任和运力定价策略。研究发现承运商和货运代理是否采用定价策略来平衡需求取决于双向港口间货运市场的潜在需求差异。同时,承运商与货运代理的空箱调运分摊为非此即彼策略,当空箱调运成本大于某阈值时,承运商独自承担空箱调运责任;反之,货运代理承担空箱调运责任。而且货运代理承担模式增加整个海运链的利润,但进一步加剧空箱的不平衡状况。
本文研究瞭單箇承運商和兩箇貨運代理在雙嚮港口間提供往返貨運服務的航運服務鏈。由于港口間貨運需求的內在不平衡,貨運公司在多港口間的空箱調運會產生巨大的空箱調運費用。分彆構建瞭承運商承擔和承運商與貨運代理共同承擔空箱調運的數學模型,通過數學模型和數值算例分析瞭不同市場條件下的空箱調運責任和運力定價策略。研究髮現承運商和貨運代理是否採用定價策略來平衡需求取決于雙嚮港口間貨運市場的潛在需求差異。同時,承運商與貨運代理的空箱調運分攤為非此即彼策略,噹空箱調運成本大于某閾值時,承運商獨自承擔空箱調運責任;反之,貨運代理承擔空箱調運責任。而且貨運代理承擔模式增加整箇海運鏈的利潤,但進一步加劇空箱的不平衡狀況。
본문연구료단개승운상화량개화운대리재쌍향항구간제공왕반화운복무적항운복무련。유우항구간화운수구적내재불평형,화운공사재다항구간적공상조운회산생거대적공상조운비용。분별구건료승운상승담화승운상여화운대리공동승담공상조운적수학모형,통과수학모형화수치산례분석료불동시장조건하적공상조운책임화운력정개책략。연구발현승운상화화운대리시부채용정개책략래평형수구취결우쌍향항구간화운시장적잠재수구차이。동시,승운상여화운대리적공상조운분탄위비차즉피책략,당공상조운성본대우모역치시,승운상독자승담공상조운책임;반지,화운대리승담공상조운책임。이차화운대리승담모식증가정개해운련적리윤,단진일보가극공상적불평형상황。
This paper studies a sea-cargo service chain with one carrier and two forwarders providing transporta-tion service between two bidirectional ports .To sustain the business , firms have to reposition empty container from a surplus port to a shortage port and incur repositioning cost if the realized demands are unbalanced .We build a stackelberg game model in two cases:empty container repositioning responsibility of the carrier and one forwarder , and analyze the optimal capacity pricing policies and empty container repositioning decisions of the carrier and forwarders .Through model analysis and simulation , it is found that whether the carrier and forwarders employ capacity pricing policy to balance the cargo demands depends on the potential demand imbalance between the bidirectional ports .When the repositioning cost is above a threshold , the carrier bears all the repositioning cost.Otherwise, the forwarder solely bears the repositioning cost .And in the latter case, the optimal capacity pricing policy will aggravate the potential imbalance between the two ports , which will increase the value of the whole supply chain .