川北医学院学报
川北醫學院學報
천북의학원학보
JOURNAL OF NORTH SICHUAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
2014年
5期
453-457
,共5页
米红兰%杨正伟%程盼%石忻蔚%殷欢欢%陈家民%沈庆恒
米紅蘭%楊正偉%程盼%石忻蔚%慇歡歡%陳傢民%瀋慶恆
미홍란%양정위%정반%석흔위%은환환%진가민%침경항
擂鼓镇%汶川大地震%羌族%汉族%家庭结构
擂鼓鎮%汶川大地震%羌族%漢族%傢庭結構
뢰고진%문천대지진%강족%한족%가정결구
Leigu town%Wenchuan earthquake%Qiang nationality%Han nationality%Family structure
目的:客观对比擂鼓镇2008年汶川大地震前后家庭结构情况并分析探讨其原因。方法:于2012年对四川省北川县擂鼓城乡进行深入到户试点调查,将调查结果与采用同样调查方法的2007年数据(调查点包括擂鼓农村)进行纵向对比分析,另就2012年数据横向对比擂鼓城乡间以及羌汉两族家庭结构情况。结果与结论:此次调查的擂鼓城乡与2007年擂鼓农村户均人口均约为4左右。汶川大地震后(2012年)擂鼓农村家庭的户均人数与地震前(2007年)相比减少了7%;擂鼓农村2007年家庭96%为核心、主干与夫妇家庭,地震后(2012年)这个比例下降至80%,扩大和其它家庭显著增加,类型更趋多元化。擂鼓城镇与农村不分民族来看家庭结构差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。擂鼓农村羌族与汉族对比:家庭规模羌汉差距不大(P>0.05);家庭类型差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),汉族家庭更趋多元化;家庭代际差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),汉族家庭更趋大户型。
目的:客觀對比擂鼓鎮2008年汶川大地震前後傢庭結構情況併分析探討其原因。方法:于2012年對四川省北川縣擂鼓城鄉進行深入到戶試點調查,將調查結果與採用同樣調查方法的2007年數據(調查點包括擂鼓農村)進行縱嚮對比分析,另就2012年數據橫嚮對比擂鼓城鄉間以及羌漢兩族傢庭結構情況。結果與結論:此次調查的擂鼓城鄉與2007年擂鼓農村戶均人口均約為4左右。汶川大地震後(2012年)擂鼓農村傢庭的戶均人數與地震前(2007年)相比減少瞭7%;擂鼓農村2007年傢庭96%為覈心、主榦與伕婦傢庭,地震後(2012年)這箇比例下降至80%,擴大和其它傢庭顯著增加,類型更趨多元化。擂鼓城鎮與農村不分民族來看傢庭結構差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。擂鼓農村羌族與漢族對比:傢庭規模羌漢差距不大(P>0.05);傢庭類型差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),漢族傢庭更趨多元化;傢庭代際差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),漢族傢庭更趨大戶型。
목적:객관대비뢰고진2008년문천대지진전후가정결구정황병분석탐토기원인。방법:우2012년대사천성북천현뢰고성향진행심입도호시점조사,장조사결과여채용동양조사방법적2007년수거(조사점포괄뢰고농촌)진행종향대비분석,령취2012년수거횡향대비뢰고성향간이급강한량족가정결구정황。결과여결론:차차조사적뢰고성향여2007년뢰고농촌호균인구균약위4좌우。문천대지진후(2012년)뢰고농촌가정적호균인수여지진전(2007년)상비감소료7%;뢰고농촌2007년가정96%위핵심、주간여부부가정,지진후(2012년)저개비례하강지80%,확대화기타가정현저증가,류형경추다원화。뢰고성진여농촌불분민족래간가정결구차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。뢰고농촌강족여한족대비:가정규모강한차거불대(P>0.05);가정류형차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),한족가정경추다원화;가정대제차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),한족가정경추대호형。
Objective:To objectively compare the family structure in Leigu town before and after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and analyze its probable causes. Methods:In 2012,we carried out a deep investigation in urban and rural Leigu in Beichuan County of Si-chuan Province. The results were vertically compared with 2007’s. The latter was obtained by the same methods and also included the information of rural Leigu. Additionally,we horizontally compared the family structure between urban and rural area of Qiang nationality and Han nationality. Results and conclusion:The average population of each family in urban and rural Leigu in this survey,close to the 2007’s findings of rural Leigu,is about 4. After the Wenchuan earthquake the average population in each family in rural Leigu decreased by 7% compared with 2007’s;96% of the family types are nuclear family,core family and couple family in rural Leigu in 2007,after the earthquake this ratio declines to 80%,with a significant increase in the expansive family and other family types,which show much more diversity. There are no significant differences in family structure between urban and rural Leigu regardless of the ethnic(P>0. 05). Comparison between Qiang nationality and Han nationality in rural Leigu shows that there is no significant difference in family size( P>0. 05),but significant difference in family types(P<0. 05),with more diverse family types of Han nationality;and the intergenerational differences have statistical significance(P<0. 05),with a tendency of multi-generation in Han nationality families.