CAJ | 학술논문

采用问卷调查法，构建层级回归模型，研究了企业创新战略与知识结构的匹配性及其对企业创新绩效的影响。从元素知识和架构知识两个维度将知识结构分为四种类型：高元素高架构、高元素低架构、低元素高架构和低元素低架构。通过SPSS18.0和AMOS18.0对400份样本数据进行分析验证。结果表明：知识结构与创新战略匹配度与组织创新绩效正相关。高元素低架构型知识结构下采用利用性创新战略、低元素高架构型知识结构下采用探索性创新战略，均能获得较好的创新绩效。
채용문권조사법，구건층급회귀모형，연구료기업창신전략여지식결구적필배성급기대기업창신적효적영향。종원소지식화가구지식량개유도장지식결구분위사충류형：고원소고가구、고원소저가구、저원소고가구화저원소저가구。통과SPSS18.0화AMOS18.0대400빈양본수거진행분석험증。결과표명：지식결구여창신전략필배도여조직창신적효정상관。고원소저가구형지식결구하채용이용성창신전략、저원소고가구형지식결구하채용탐색성창신전략，균능획득교호적창신적효。
By questionnaires survey, this paper constructed the hierarchical regression models to explore the intrin-sic implications mechanisms for innovative performance from the match between innovation strategy and know-ledge structure. From the perspective of component knowledge and architectural knowledge, the knowledge struc-ture was divided into four types, high-component with high-architectural, high-component with low-architectural, low-component with high-architectural and low-component with low-architectural. We used the soft ware of AMOS18.0 and SPSS18.0 to analyze the 400 samples from the questionnaires and the results of the analysis indi-cate that the enterprises with good match between innovation strategic and knowledge structure will show better in-novative performance. High-component with low-architectural should adopt the exploitative innovation strategy, while low-component with high-architectural should choose the exploratory innovation strategy.