CAJ | 학술논문

[目的]了解不同教育体系下男护生职业生涯规划及决策困难程度。[方法]选择两所学校，学校1开设《职业生涯规划与指导》课程，学校2开设《就业指导》课程，并应用一般资料问卷、护生职业生涯规划问卷和大学生职业决策困难问卷对两种教学体系下147名男护生进行分层对比。[结果]两校一年级、二年级男护生职业生涯规划得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)；各年级男护生决策困难得分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]分层级职业生涯教育体系更符合男护生特性；生涯教育目标仅达到了情感承诺，缺乏规范承诺和继续承诺，应重点加强这方面的职业生涯规划教育。
[목적]료해불동교육체계하남호생직업생애규화급결책곤난정도。[방법]선택량소학교，학교1개설《직업생애규화여지도》과정，학교2개설《취업지도》과정，병응용일반자료문권、호생직업생애규화문권화대학생직업결책곤난문권대량충교학체계하147명남호생진행분층대비。[결과]량교일년급、이년급남호생직업생애규화득분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)；각년급남호생결책곤난득분비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。[결론]분층급직업생애교육체계경부합남호생특성；생애교육목표부체도료정감승낙，결핍규범승낙화계속승낙，응중점가강저방면적직업생애규화교육。
Objective:To know about the male nursing students’career planning and decision making difficult degree under the different educa-tion systems.Methods:Two schools were selected.“Career planning and quidance”curriculum was opened in school 1 ,and“career guidance”cur-riculum was opened in school 2.and the general information question-naire,nursing students career planning questionnaire and college students career decision difficulties questionnaire were used for stratified compari-son of 147 male nursing students in No.1 school under two different ca-reer planning education systems.Results:There was statistically signifi-cant difference in career planning score of male nursing students in grade one,grade two between both schools(P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference in decision making difficult score among all grades of male nursing students(P>0.05).Conclusion:hierarchical career edu-cation system is more in line with the characteristics of male nursing students;career education goals only reached emotional commitment,it is still lack of normative commitment and continuing commitment,so career planning education should focus on strengthening in these aspects.