中国民康医学
中國民康醫學
중국민강의학
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINSEE PEOPLE HEALTH
2014年
20期
10-12
,共3页
纪晶菁%董飞%周燕燕%荆瑶
紀晶菁%董飛%週燕燕%荊瑤
기정정%동비%주연연%형요
护理%干预%癌症%治疗
護理%榦預%癌癥%治療
호리%간예%암증%치료
Nursing%Intervention%Cancer%Treatment
目的：观察护理干预对晚期癌症患者生存质量的影响。方法：选择晚期癌症患者120例，随机分为干预组和对照组，每组各60例。对照组患者予以常规护理，干预组患者在对照组的基础上予以干预护理。观察两组患者的诊断知晓度，有效止痛，心理承受能力，生活状态和临终需求等，以及其治疗前后的疲乏量表( PFS)评分和生活质量评分。结果：干预组患者的诊断知晓度、有效止痛、心理承受能力、生活状态和临终需求均较对照组明显提高(P<0.01)。两组患者治疗前的FPS和生活质量评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)，治疗后两组患者的FPS和生活质量评分均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.01)，且干预组患者改善程度与对照组比有明显差异(P<0.01)。结论：干预护理能有效改善晚期癌症患者生存质量。
目的：觀察護理榦預對晚期癌癥患者生存質量的影響。方法：選擇晚期癌癥患者120例，隨機分為榦預組和對照組，每組各60例。對照組患者予以常規護理，榦預組患者在對照組的基礎上予以榦預護理。觀察兩組患者的診斷知曉度，有效止痛，心理承受能力，生活狀態和臨終需求等，以及其治療前後的疲乏量錶( PFS)評分和生活質量評分。結果：榦預組患者的診斷知曉度、有效止痛、心理承受能力、生活狀態和臨終需求均較對照組明顯提高(P<0.01)。兩組患者治療前的FPS和生活質量評分差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)，治療後兩組患者的FPS和生活質量評分均較治療前明顯改善(P<0.01)，且榦預組患者改善程度與對照組比有明顯差異(P<0.01)。結論：榦預護理能有效改善晚期癌癥患者生存質量。
목적：관찰호리간예대만기암증환자생존질량적영향。방법：선택만기암증환자120례，수궤분위간예조화대조조，매조각60례。대조조환자여이상규호리，간예조환자재대조조적기출상여이간예호리。관찰량조환자적진단지효도，유효지통，심리승수능력，생활상태화림종수구등，이급기치료전후적피핍량표( PFS)평분화생활질량평분。결과：간예조환자적진단지효도、유효지통、심리승수능력、생활상태화림종수구균교대조조명현제고(P<0.01)。량조환자치료전적FPS화생활질량평분차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)，치료후량조환자적FPS화생활질량평분균교치료전명현개선(P<0.01)，차간예조환자개선정도여대조조비유명현차이(P<0.01)。결론：간예호리능유효개선만기암증환자생존질량。
Objective: To investigate influence of nursing intervention on quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Methods:120 patients with advanced cancer were randomly divided into intervention group and control group, each group had 60 ca-ses. The control group received usual care, while the intervention group was given nursing intervention on the basis of that of control group. Awareness degree of diagnosis, effective relieving pain, mental capacity, living conditions and needs of the dying were observed for the two groups, and the Parkinson's disease fatigue scale ( PFS) and quality of life scores were detected before and after the treat-ment. Results:The awareness degree of diagnosis, effective relieving pain, mental capacity, living conditions and needs of the dying in intervention group significantly increased compared with those in control group (P<0. 01). The differences of the levels of FPS and quality of life scores before the treatment were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0. 05), however, after the treat-ment, the levels of FPS and quality of life score of the two groups were improved than those before the treatment (P<0. 01), and the improvement of intervention group was more obvious than that of control group (P<0. 01). Conclusions:The nursing intervention can improve the quality of life in the patients with advanced cancer.
