CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较三种不同的插胃管方法的临床效果。方法：将需要插胃管的102例患者随机分为三组，A 组34例患者进行常规插管，B 组34例患者采用石蜡油润滑胃管的方法进行插管，C 组34例患者采用吞服达克罗宁凝胶的方法进行插管，比较三组患者的插管成功情况以及对胃管刺激的反应程度。结果：C 组的1次插管成功率明显高于其余两组，且患者对胃管插入刺激的反应程度明显低于其余两组，差异均具统计学意义（P <0.05）。结论：采用达克罗宁凝胶协助胃管插管，操作简单、效果显著，值得临床推广。
목적：비교삼충불동적삽위관방법적림상효과。방법：장수요삽위관적102례환자수궤분위삼조，A 조34례환자진행상규삽관，B 조34례환자채용석사유윤활위관적방법진행삽관，C 조34례환자채용탄복체극라저응효적방법진행삽관，비교삼조환자적삽관성공정황이급대위관자격적반응정도。결과：C 조적1차삽관성공솔명현고우기여량조，차환자대위관삽입자격적반응정도명현저우기여량조，차이균구통계학의의（P <0.05）。결론：채용체극라저응효협조위관삽관，조작간단、효과현저，치득림상추엄。
Objective To observe the effects of three different inserting stomach tube methods. Method 102 needed inserting stomach tube patients were selected and divided into three groups. In group A,34 patients were treated by routine intubation. In group B,34 pa-tients were treated by routine intubation combined with paroline lubrication. In group C,34 patients were treated by routine intubation com-bined with dyclonine gel. The effects of the three groups were compared. Results The first time silicon success of group C was higher than other two groups. The adverse reaction extent of group C was lower than other two groups(P < 0. 05). Conclusion Dyclonine gel assistance inserting stomach tube is a simple operation. The effect is significant. It is worth for generalization.