CAJ | 학술논문

目的：以椎管内肿瘤切除术临床路径的实施过程为个案，探讨单病种临床路径实施过程的评价指标体系。方法采取Delphi法进行3轮专家咨询论证，从而最终确定针对临床路径实施过程的评价指标体系。结果专家咨询调查表回收率均为100％，第3轮咨询调查显示专家的总体权威程度约为0．84，专家们对于各指标重要性赋值均数均介于4（重要）～5分（很重要）之间，变异系数为0．112～0．285。结论专家参与调查的积极性高，专家对于各指标重要性的意见较集中，协调程度较高，调查结果具有较高的可信度。
목적：이추관내종류절제술림상로경적실시과정위개안，탐토단병충림상로경실시과정적평개지표체계。방법채취Delphi법진행3륜전가자순론증，종이최종학정침대림상로경실시과정적평개지표체계。결과전가자순조사표회수솔균위100％，제3륜자순조사현시전가적총체권위정도약위0．84，전가문대우각지표중요성부치균수균개우4（중요）～5분（흔중요）지간，변이계수위0．112～0．285。결론전가삼여조사적적겁성고，전가대우각지표중요성적의견교집중，협조정도교고，조사결과구유교고적가신도。
implementation process using the process of clinical pathway in intraspinal tumor resectionas a case study . Methods Take Delphi method of experts for three rounds , and finally to determine the evaluation system of clinical pathway implementation process .Results The recovery rate of the questionnaire on expert consultationwas 100%.The third round of expert investigation showed that the overall degree of authority was about 0.84, the average scores of the importance of each index from experts were all from 4 (important) to 5 (very important ), and the coefficient of variation was fluctuation in the range of 0.112 ~0.285. Conclusions Experts who take part in the investigation are full of enthusiasm , the viewpoints of the importance of each index from experts are relatively concentrated , the coordination degree is higher , and the results of the survey have higher reliability.