CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较本科生与教师对学生标准化患者（ SSP ）模拟水平评价的差异。方法选取11名教师和91名本科生，采用自设问卷评价学生标准化患者的模拟水平。结果本科生和教师对学生标准化患者的模拟水平的评价得分分别为（3．76±0．30），（3．69±0．23）分，差异无统计学意义（t＝0．73，P＞0．05）；评价条目中具有差异的项目是条目11（ SSP回答问题具有针对性），12（ SSP没有使用诱导性语言、医学术语）和13（各站SSP模拟的情景内容前后协调一致），学生评价得分分别为（3．88±0．36），（3．92±0．31），（3．80±0．54）分，教师评价得分分别为（3．55±0．21），（3．47±0．79），（3．56±0．20）分，差异有统计学意义（t分别为2．03，5．32，2．15；P＜0．05）。结论应用标准化患者时应从多角度增加评价主体进行考核，以减少评价误差的存在。
목적：비교본과생여교사대학생표준화환자（ SSP ）모의수평평개적차이。방법선취11명교사화91명본과생，채용자설문권평개학생표준화환자적모의수평。결과본과생화교사대학생표준화환자적모의수평적평개득분분별위（3．76±0．30），（3．69±0．23）분，차이무통계학의의（t＝0．73，P＞0．05）；평개조목중구유차이적항목시조목11（ SSP회답문제구유침대성），12（ SSP몰유사용유도성어언、의학술어）화13（각참SSP모의적정경내용전후협조일치），학생평개득분분별위（3．88±0．36），（3．92±0．31），（3．80±0．54）분，교사평개득분분별위（3．55±0．21），（3．47±0．79），（3．56±0．20）분，차이유통계학의의（t분별위2．03，5．32，2．15；P＜0．05）。결론응용표준화환자시응종다각도증가평개주체진행고핵，이감소평개오차적존재。
Objective To compare the differences in the evaluation for simulation level of students standardized patients (SSP) between undergraduates and teachers .Methods Eleven teachers and ninety-one undergraduates were selected , and investigated with self -designed questionnaire on the evaluation for simulation level of SSP .Results The aggregate score of the evaluation for simulation level of students standardized patients among undergraduate students was (3.76 ±0.30), which was (3.69 ±0.23) among teachers, and the difference was not statistically significant (t =0.73,P >0.05).But , there were statistically significant differences in the item 11 ( SSP answered the questions pointedly ) , the item 12 ( SSP didn ’ t use inductive language , or medical terms ) and the item 13 ( The scenario and situation simulated by SSP in each experimental unit were consistent ) between undergraduates and teachers [(3.88 ±0.36) vs (3.55 ±0.21), (3.92 ±0.31) vs (3.47 ±0.79), (3.80 ±0.54) vs (3.56 ±0.20); t =2.03,t =5.32,t =2.15, respectively;P<0.05].Conclusions SSP should be assessed from multiple perspectives , so the evaluation subjects should be increased in use of standardized patients assessment , which can reduce the error .