中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
6期
734-737
,共4页
护理标识%神经外科%重症护理
護理標識%神經外科%重癥護理
호리표식%신경외과%중증호리
Nursing mark%Department of neurosurgery%Intensive nursing
目的：总结各种普通及专用护理标识在神经外科 ICU应用的方法以及效果。方法2012年7-12月设计神经外科ICU所应用的各种护理标识，并应用于484例神经外科ICU患者（观察组），并与2011年7-12月实施常规护理的478例神经外科ICU患者（对照组）进行回顾性分析比较，分析其对护理质量的影响。结果观察组两组患者肺部感染、意外拔管和压疮发生率分别为0．41％，0．21％，0．21％，低于对照组的1．88％，1．46％，1．46％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（χ2值分别为4．60，4．61，4．61；P＜0．05）。观察组基础护理、特级护理质量分别为（96．22±3．10），（95．17±3．82）分，分别高于对照组的（93．20±3．34），（92．15±3．55）分，两组比较差异有统计学意义（ t 值分别为6．80，6．77；P＜0．05）。观察组患者和护士满意度分别为97．93％，100．00％，高于对照组的95．40％，73．33％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（χ2值分别为4．81，4．62；P＜0．05）。结论护理标识的使用不仅能够减少护理差错的发生，提升护理质量，而且有利于护患关系的建立。
目的：總結各種普通及專用護理標識在神經外科 ICU應用的方法以及效果。方法2012年7-12月設計神經外科ICU所應用的各種護理標識，併應用于484例神經外科ICU患者（觀察組），併與2011年7-12月實施常規護理的478例神經外科ICU患者（對照組）進行迴顧性分析比較，分析其對護理質量的影響。結果觀察組兩組患者肺部感染、意外拔管和壓瘡髮生率分彆為0．41％，0．21％，0．21％，低于對照組的1．88％，1．46％，1．46％，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（χ2值分彆為4．60，4．61，4．61；P＜0．05）。觀察組基礎護理、特級護理質量分彆為（96．22±3．10），（95．17±3．82）分，分彆高于對照組的（93．20±3．34），（92．15±3．55）分，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（ t 值分彆為6．80，6．77；P＜0．05）。觀察組患者和護士滿意度分彆為97．93％，100．00％，高于對照組的95．40％，73．33％，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（χ2值分彆為4．81，4．62；P＜0．05）。結論護理標識的使用不僅能夠減少護理差錯的髮生，提升護理質量，而且有利于護患關繫的建立。
목적：총결각충보통급전용호리표식재신경외과 ICU응용적방법이급효과。방법2012년7-12월설계신경외과ICU소응용적각충호리표식，병응용우484례신경외과ICU환자（관찰조），병여2011년7-12월실시상규호리적478례신경외과ICU환자（대조조）진행회고성분석비교，분석기대호리질량적영향。결과관찰조량조환자폐부감염、의외발관화압창발생솔분별위0．41％，0．21％，0．21％，저우대조조적1．88％，1．46％，1．46％，량조비교차이유통계학의의（χ2치분별위4．60，4．61，4．61；P＜0．05）。관찰조기출호리、특급호리질량분별위（96．22±3．10），（95．17±3．82）분，분별고우대조조적（93．20±3．34），（92．15±3．55）분，량조비교차이유통계학의의（ t 치분별위6．80，6．77；P＜0．05）。관찰조환자화호사만의도분별위97．93％，100．00％，고우대조조적95．40％，73．33％，량조비교차이유통계학의의（χ2치분별위4．81，4．62；P＜0．05）。결론호리표식적사용불부능구감소호리차착적발생，제승호리질량，이차유리우호환관계적건립。
Objective To summarize the application and effect of all kinds of ordinary and special nursing marks in the ICU of neurosurgery .Methods All kinds of nursing marks used in the ICU of neurosurgery were designed from July 2012 to December 2012 , and were applied to 484 patients in ICU of neurosurgery ( the observation group ) , and 478 patients in ICU of neurosurgery from July 2011 to December 2011 received the routine nursing ( the control group ) .The data were compared by the retrospective analysis , and the effect of nursing marks on quality of nursing was analyzed .Results The rates of pulmonary infection , accidental extubation and pressure ulcer were respectively 0.41%, 0.21%, 0.21%in the observation group, which were lower than 1.88%, 1.46%,1.46%in the control group , and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =4.60, 4.61, 4.61, respectively; P<0.05).The average scores of quality of basic and special nursing were respectively (96.22 ±3.10), (95.17 ±3.82) in the observation group, which were higher than (93.20 ± 3.34), (92.15 ±3.55) in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=6.80, 6.77, respectively;P<0.05).The satisfaction rates of patients and nurses were respectively 97.93%, 100.00% in the observation group, which were higher than 95.40%, 73.33%in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =4.81, 4.62, respectively;P<0.05).Conclusions Nursing marks can not only reduce the occurrence of nursing errors , improve the quality of nursing , but also are conducive to the establishment of nurse-patient relationship .
