中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
6期
686-688
,共3页
郎巧英%翁佩玲%胡红英%施春燕
郎巧英%翁珮玲%鬍紅英%施春燕
랑교영%옹패령%호홍영%시춘연
护理%喘憋性肺炎%雾化吸入
護理%喘憋性肺炎%霧化吸入
호리%천별성폐염%무화흡입
Nursing%Pediatric asthmatic suffocating pneumonia%Atomization inhalation
目的:探讨对喘憋性肺炎患儿进行雾化吸入治疗的临床护理效果。方法将诊治的小儿喘憋性肺炎患儿93例,随机分为观察组47例和对照组46例,对照组患儿给予一般基础治疗(抗生素控制感染、镇静平喘、止咳化痰等)和常规护理措施(健康教育、饮食护理、心理护理等),观察组患儿在给予和对照组相同的治疗和护理的基础上使用雾化吸入治疗,观察治疗护理效果。结果观察组的治疗总有效率为93.6%(44/47),高于对照组的67.4%(31/46),差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.244,P<0.05);观察组患儿咳喘和啰音消失的平均时间及平均住院时间分别为(6.4±1.5),(7.0±1.7),(8.1±2.1)d,分别短于对照组的(9.1±1.4),(10.2±2.0),(10.9±1.9)d,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为10.541,13.293,10.941;P<0.01)。结论在给予喘憋性肺炎患儿一般临床诊疗和护理基础上,进行雾化吸入治疗可以有效提高患儿的治疗效果,减轻患儿病痛,并促进患儿早日康复。
目的:探討對喘憋性肺炎患兒進行霧化吸入治療的臨床護理效果。方法將診治的小兒喘憋性肺炎患兒93例,隨機分為觀察組47例和對照組46例,對照組患兒給予一般基礎治療(抗生素控製感染、鎮靜平喘、止咳化痰等)和常規護理措施(健康教育、飲食護理、心理護理等),觀察組患兒在給予和對照組相同的治療和護理的基礎上使用霧化吸入治療,觀察治療護理效果。結果觀察組的治療總有效率為93.6%(44/47),高于對照組的67.4%(31/46),差異有統計學意義(χ2=10.244,P<0.05);觀察組患兒咳喘和啰音消失的平均時間及平均住院時間分彆為(6.4±1.5),(7.0±1.7),(8.1±2.1)d,分彆短于對照組的(9.1±1.4),(10.2±2.0),(10.9±1.9)d,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為10.541,13.293,10.941;P<0.01)。結論在給予喘憋性肺炎患兒一般臨床診療和護理基礎上,進行霧化吸入治療可以有效提高患兒的治療效果,減輕患兒病痛,併促進患兒早日康複。
목적:탐토대천별성폐염환인진행무화흡입치료적림상호리효과。방법장진치적소인천별성폐염환인93례,수궤분위관찰조47례화대조조46례,대조조환인급여일반기출치료(항생소공제감염、진정평천、지해화담등)화상규호리조시(건강교육、음식호리、심리호리등),관찰조환인재급여화대조조상동적치료화호리적기출상사용무화흡입치료,관찰치료호리효과。결과관찰조적치료총유효솔위93.6%(44/47),고우대조조적67.4%(31/46),차이유통계학의의(χ2=10.244,P<0.05);관찰조환인해천화라음소실적평균시간급평균주원시간분별위(6.4±1.5),(7.0±1.7),(8.1±2.1)d,분별단우대조조적(9.1±1.4),(10.2±2.0),(10.9±1.9)d,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(t치분별위10.541,13.293,10.941;P<0.01)。결론재급여천별성폐염환인일반림상진료화호리기출상,진행무화흡입치료가이유효제고환인적치료효과,감경환인병통,병촉진환인조일강복。
Objective To explore the clinical nursing effect of the atomization inhalation therapy on pediatric asthmatic suffocating pneumonia .Methods Ninety-three patients with pediatric asthmatic suffocating pneumonia were chosen and randomly divided into the observation group ( n=47 ) and the control group ( n=46).The control group received the routine treatment (controlling infection through antibiotics , keeping calm and reducing of asthma , relieving cough and sputum , etc.) and conventional nursing measures ( health education, diet nursing, psychological nursing, etc.), and the observation group received the atomization inhalation therapy on the basis of the control group .The nursing and therapeutic effects were compared between the two groups .Results The total effective rate of treatment was 93 .6%( 44/47 ) in the observation group , which was higher than 67.4%( 31/46 ) in the control group , and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =10.244, P<0.05).The average time of the disappear of asthma and moist rales and the hospital stay were (6.4 ±1.5), (7.0 ±1.7), (8.1 ±2.1) d in the observation group, which were shorter than (9.1 ± 1.4), (10.2 ±2.0), (10.9 ±1.9) d in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=10.541, 13.293, 10.941, respectively; P <0.01).Conclusions Application of the atomization inhalation therapy on pediatric asthmatic suffocating pneumonia based on the routine treatment and nursing can effectively improve the therapeutic effect , relieve the pain of patients and promote the rehabilitation of patients .