中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
11期
1288-1290
,共3页
曾静%杜娴%杜娟%方圆文%艾向霞%杨燕
曾靜%杜嫻%杜娟%方圓文%艾嚮霞%楊燕
증정%두한%두연%방원문%애향하%양연
肿瘤%症状群%放松练习%认知行为干预
腫瘤%癥狀群%放鬆練習%認知行為榦預
종류%증상군%방송연습%인지행위간예
Neoplasm%Symptoms%Relaxation exercise%Intervention of cognitive behavior
目的:探讨对晚期癌症患者疼痛、疲乏及睡眠障碍症状群进行认知行为综合干预的有效性。方法采用完全随机抽样法将62例癌症晚期患者分成干预组32例和对照组30例,在入院为期1周的研究时间内,对干预组患者进行放松练习和自然意象认知行为的干预。采用疼痛数字评价量表、简易疲劳量表( BFI)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数( PSQI)及安德森症状测量表对患者进行调查,比较两组症状强度上存在的差异。结果疼痛、疲乏、胃口差及睡眠障碍为最常见的症状,其症状频率分别为95.1%,92.6%,88.5%,86.1%。干预组患者的平均疼痛评分为(2.47±0.53)分,低于对照组的(5.54±0.37)分,差异有统计学意义(t=2.84,P<0.01);干预组患者的BFI评分为(3.44±1.24)分,低于对照组的(4.92±0.41)分,差异有统计学意义(t =2.47,P<0.05);干预组患者的 PSQI 评分为(2.67±0.73)分,低于对照组的(5.18±1.09)分,差异有统计学意义(t=5.34,P<0.01)。结论对晚期癌症患者进行认知行为的综合干预,可以有效改善晚期癌症患者的疼痛、疲劳及睡眠障碍等症状。
目的:探討對晚期癌癥患者疼痛、疲乏及睡眠障礙癥狀群進行認知行為綜閤榦預的有效性。方法採用完全隨機抽樣法將62例癌癥晚期患者分成榦預組32例和對照組30例,在入院為期1週的研究時間內,對榦預組患者進行放鬆練習和自然意象認知行為的榦預。採用疼痛數字評價量錶、簡易疲勞量錶( BFI)、匹玆堡睡眠質量指數( PSQI)及安德森癥狀測量錶對患者進行調查,比較兩組癥狀彊度上存在的差異。結果疼痛、疲乏、胃口差及睡眠障礙為最常見的癥狀,其癥狀頻率分彆為95.1%,92.6%,88.5%,86.1%。榦預組患者的平均疼痛評分為(2.47±0.53)分,低于對照組的(5.54±0.37)分,差異有統計學意義(t=2.84,P<0.01);榦預組患者的BFI評分為(3.44±1.24)分,低于對照組的(4.92±0.41)分,差異有統計學意義(t =2.47,P<0.05);榦預組患者的 PSQI 評分為(2.67±0.73)分,低于對照組的(5.18±1.09)分,差異有統計學意義(t=5.34,P<0.01)。結論對晚期癌癥患者進行認知行為的綜閤榦預,可以有效改善晚期癌癥患者的疼痛、疲勞及睡眠障礙等癥狀。
목적:탐토대만기암증환자동통、피핍급수면장애증상군진행인지행위종합간예적유효성。방법채용완전수궤추양법장62례암증만기환자분성간예조32례화대조조30례,재입원위기1주적연구시간내,대간예조환자진행방송연습화자연의상인지행위적간예。채용동통수자평개량표、간역피로량표( BFI)、필자보수면질량지수( PSQI)급안덕삼증상측량표대환자진행조사,비교량조증상강도상존재적차이。결과동통、피핍、위구차급수면장애위최상견적증상,기증상빈솔분별위95.1%,92.6%,88.5%,86.1%。간예조환자적평균동통평분위(2.47±0.53)분,저우대조조적(5.54±0.37)분,차이유통계학의의(t=2.84,P<0.01);간예조환자적BFI평분위(3.44±1.24)분,저우대조조적(4.92±0.41)분,차이유통계학의의(t =2.47,P<0.05);간예조환자적 PSQI 평분위(2.67±0.73)분,저우대조조적(5.18±1.09)분,차이유통계학의의(t=5.34,P<0.01)。결론대만기암증환자진행인지행위적종합간예,가이유효개선만기암증환자적동통、피로급수면장애등증상。
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of comprehensive intervention of cognitive behavior on the symptoms of pain , fatigue and sleep disorders for patients with advanced cancer .Methods Sixty-two patients with advanced cancer were divided into the experimental group ( n=32 ) and the control group ( n=30).The experimental group was given relaxation exercises and natural image intervention .Then the digital pain evaluation , brief fatigue inventory ( BFI ) , Pittsburgh sleep quality index ( PSQI ) and the Anderson symptom inventory ( MDASI ) were applied to analyze the differences between the experimental group and the control group.Results Pain, fatigue, poor appetite and sleep disorder were the most common symptoms , and the incidence of these symptoms were 95.1%, 92.6%, 88.5% and 86.1%, respectively.The average pain score of patients in the experimental group was (2.47 ±0.53), which was significantly lower than (5.54 ± 0.37) of patients in the control group, with a significant difference(t=2.84,P<0.01).The score of BFI for patients in the experimental group was (3.44 ±1.24), which was significantly lower than (4.92 ±0.41) of patients in the control group, with a significant difference (t=2.47,P<0.05).The score of PSQI for patients in the experimental group was (2.67 ±0.73), which was significantly lower than (5.18 ±1.09) of patients in the control group, with a significant difference (t =5.34,P <0.01).Conclusions The cognitive behavior intervention can effectively alleviate symptoms including pain , fatigue, and sleep disorder for patients with advanced cancer .