临床医学
臨床醫學
림상의학
CLINICAL MEDICINE
2014年
11期
25-26
,共2页
余静%刘蓉%李艳%杜继宇%邓琳凡%董金蓉%王敏%杨进宇
餘靜%劉蓉%李豔%杜繼宇%鄧琳凡%董金蓉%王敏%楊進宇
여정%류용%리염%두계우%산림범%동금용%왕민%양진우
人工支气管激发试验%乙酰甲胆碱%可靠性%慢性咳嗽%潮气肺功能%婴幼儿
人工支氣管激髮試驗%乙酰甲膽堿%可靠性%慢性咳嗽%潮氣肺功能%嬰幼兒
인공지기관격발시험%을선갑담감%가고성%만성해수%조기폐공능%영유인
Artificial bronchial provocation test%Methacholine%Reliability%Chronic cough%Moisture breathing lung func-tion%Infant
目的:评价婴幼儿人工乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验(通过肺部听诊进行气道高反应性结果判断)的可靠性。方法选择82例在绵阳市中心医院按照《儿童慢性咳嗽诊断和治疗指南》诊断为慢性咳嗽的婴幼儿做为试验对象,用乙酰甲胆碱从低浓度开始逐渐递增浓度进行激发试验,每次雾化吸入药物后首先进行肺部听诊,再进行潮气肺通气功能检查,肺部任何区域出现哮鸣音、氧饱和度下降大于5%或 MCH 浓度已达到16 mg/ ml 时终止激发试验,对两种方式判断的结果进行比较。结果根据潮气肺功能判断的阳性率为68.3%,通过肺部听诊的人工激发试验判断阳性率为59.8%,潮气肺功能判断为阴性的病例通过人工听诊方法均判断为阴性。结论婴幼儿人工支气管激发试验方法可靠,特异性高,敏感性略低于潮气肺通气功能检查的结果,有一定的假阴性,但仅为8.5%,为不具备潮气肺功能仪的医院完成支气管激发试验的一种替代手段。
目的:評價嬰幼兒人工乙酰甲膽堿支氣管激髮試驗(通過肺部聽診進行氣道高反應性結果判斷)的可靠性。方法選擇82例在綿暘市中心醫院按照《兒童慢性咳嗽診斷和治療指南》診斷為慢性咳嗽的嬰幼兒做為試驗對象,用乙酰甲膽堿從低濃度開始逐漸遞增濃度進行激髮試驗,每次霧化吸入藥物後首先進行肺部聽診,再進行潮氣肺通氣功能檢查,肺部任何區域齣現哮鳴音、氧飽和度下降大于5%或 MCH 濃度已達到16 mg/ ml 時終止激髮試驗,對兩種方式判斷的結果進行比較。結果根據潮氣肺功能判斷的暘性率為68.3%,通過肺部聽診的人工激髮試驗判斷暘性率為59.8%,潮氣肺功能判斷為陰性的病例通過人工聽診方法均判斷為陰性。結論嬰幼兒人工支氣管激髮試驗方法可靠,特異性高,敏感性略低于潮氣肺通氣功能檢查的結果,有一定的假陰性,但僅為8.5%,為不具備潮氣肺功能儀的醫院完成支氣管激髮試驗的一種替代手段。
목적:평개영유인인공을선갑담감지기관격발시험(통과폐부은진진행기도고반응성결과판단)적가고성。방법선택82례재면양시중심의원안조《인동만성해수진단화치료지남》진단위만성해수적영유인주위시험대상,용을선갑담감종저농도개시축점체증농도진행격발시험,매차무화흡입약물후수선진행폐부은진,재진행조기폐통기공능검사,폐부임하구역출현효명음、양포화도하강대우5%혹 MCH 농도이체도16 mg/ ml 시종지격발시험,대량충방식판단적결과진행비교。결과근거조기폐공능판단적양성솔위68.3%,통과폐부은진적인공격발시험판단양성솔위59.8%,조기폐공능판단위음성적병례통과인공은진방법균판단위음성。결론영유인인공지기관격발시험방법가고,특이성고,민감성략저우조기폐통기공능검사적결과,유일정적가음성,단부위8.5%,위불구비조기폐공능의적의원완성지기관격발시험적일충체대수단。
Objective To evaluate the reliability of artificial methacholine bronchial provocation test in infant(judging by auscultation of the lungs airway hyperresponsiveness). Methods Eighty-two infants in our hospital who were diagnosed as chro-nic cough in accordance with the“guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in children”were choseas test ob-jects. Provocation test was made by gradually increasing the concentration of methacholine. Each time after given aerosolized drugs,the lung auscultation was made,then tidal pulmonary ventilation function test was made. The provocation test was termi-nated when any regional pulmonary wheezing occurred,oxygen saturation decreased more than 5% or MCH concentration reached 16 mg/ ml. The results of two methods were compared. Results The positive rate of judgment according to the tidal pulmonary function was 68. 3% ,and the positive rate of judgment of artificial stimulation test through the lungs auscultation 59. 8% ,the moisture of pulmonary function judged as negative cases by artificial auscultation method judged as negative. Conclusion Artifi-cial methacholine bronchial provocation test is reliable and has high specificity. Its sensitivity was slightly lower than the moisture breathing lung function test results. The false negative results was 8. 5% . It can be recommend as an alternative judgement meth-od of methacholine bronchial provocation test in hospital without the pulmonary function instrument.