中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
15期
1809-1812
,共4页
宫内节育器%育龄妇女%焦虑%抑郁%小组心理干预
宮內節育器%育齡婦女%焦慮%抑鬱%小組心理榦預
궁내절육기%육령부녀%초필%억욱%소조심리간예
Intrauterine device%Reproductive women%Anxiety%Depression%Group psychological intervention
目的:探讨小组心理干预对放置宫内节育器农村育龄妇女焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响,为避孕节育措施的开展提供理论与实践的依据。方法对102名放置宫内节育器农村育龄妇女进行小组心理干预,采用焦虑自评量表( SAS)、抑郁自评量表( SAS)评价干预前后的不良情绪状况。结果干预前102名农村育龄妇女焦虑、抑郁的检出率分别为29.4%和9.8%,干预后分别降至2.9%和1.0%,干预前后比较差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为26.354,7.783;P<0.01);干预后SAS为(33.1±7.8)分、SDS为(35.2±8.1)分,均低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为2.612,2.866;P<0.01)。结论放置宫内节育器对农村育龄妇女可能是引发其焦虑、抑郁的应激源,小组心理干预能够明显改善其焦虑、抑郁不良情绪。
目的:探討小組心理榦預對放置宮內節育器農村育齡婦女焦慮、抑鬱情緒的影響,為避孕節育措施的開展提供理論與實踐的依據。方法對102名放置宮內節育器農村育齡婦女進行小組心理榦預,採用焦慮自評量錶( SAS)、抑鬱自評量錶( SAS)評價榦預前後的不良情緒狀況。結果榦預前102名農村育齡婦女焦慮、抑鬱的檢齣率分彆為29.4%和9.8%,榦預後分彆降至2.9%和1.0%,榦預前後比較差異均有統計學意義(χ2值分彆為26.354,7.783;P<0.01);榦預後SAS為(33.1±7.8)分、SDS為(35.2±8.1)分,均低于榦預前,差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為2.612,2.866;P<0.01)。結論放置宮內節育器對農村育齡婦女可能是引髮其焦慮、抑鬱的應激源,小組心理榦預能夠明顯改善其焦慮、抑鬱不良情緒。
목적:탐토소조심리간예대방치궁내절육기농촌육령부녀초필、억욱정서적영향,위피잉절육조시적개전제공이론여실천적의거。방법대102명방치궁내절육기농촌육령부녀진행소조심리간예,채용초필자평량표( SAS)、억욱자평량표( SAS)평개간예전후적불량정서상황。결과간예전102명농촌육령부녀초필、억욱적검출솔분별위29.4%화9.8%,간예후분별강지2.9%화1.0%,간예전후비교차이균유통계학의의(χ2치분별위26.354,7.783;P<0.01);간예후SAS위(33.1±7.8)분、SDS위(35.2±8.1)분,균저우간예전,차이유통계학의의(t치분별위2.612,2.866;P<0.01)。결론방치궁내절육기대농촌육령부녀가능시인발기초필、억욱적응격원,소조심리간예능구명현개선기초필、억욱불량정서。
Objective To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on anxiety and depression in rural reproductive women with intrauterine device ( IUD) in order to provide the theoretical and practical basis for carrying out contraceptive measures .Methods One hundred and two rural reproductive women with IUD were chosen and received the group psychological intervention , and the unhealthy moods were evaluated by the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and the self-rating depression scale (SDS) before and after intervention .Results The detection rates of anxiety and depression in rural reproductive women before intervention were respectively 29.4%(30/102) and 9.8%(10/102), and were higher than 2.9%and 1.0%after intervention, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =26.354, 7.783, respectively;P <0.01).The scores of SAS and SDS were respectively (33.1 ±7.8), (35.2 ±8.1) after intervention, and were lower than those before intervention , and the differences were statistically significant ( t =2.612, 2.866, respectively;P<0.01).Conclusions IUD might be the stress source of causing the anxiety and depression in rural reproductive women , and the group psychological intervention can significant improve their unhealthy moods including anxiety and depression .