中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
19期
2408-2410
,共3页
护理管理研究%护理不良事件%信息化管理系统%干预处置时间%漏报率
護理管理研究%護理不良事件%信息化管理繫統%榦預處置時間%漏報率
호리관리연구%호리불량사건%신식화관리계통%간예처치시간%루보솔
Nursing administration research%Nursing adverse events%Information management system%Intervention time%Rate of missing report
目的:探讨设计与应用护理不良事件信息化管理系统对可能发生护理不良事件的高危患者在安全管理效率和护理质量方面的影响。方法研发“护理不良事件信息化管理系统”,在此系统应用7个月后,选择实施前2012年6-12月进行高危风险因素上报和处理的80例患者为对照组,选择实施后2013年1-7月进行高危风险因素上报和处理的80例患者为观察组,对两组患者干预处置时间和漏报率进行比较。结果观察组干预处置时间为(2.45±0.58)h,低于对照组的(3.46±0.54)h,差异有统计学意义(t=11.40,P<0.01);观察组漏报率为5%,低于对照组的25%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.55,P<0.01)。结论护理不良事件信息化管理系统实行以来起到良好的效果,在护理安全管理方面有积极意义。
目的:探討設計與應用護理不良事件信息化管理繫統對可能髮生護理不良事件的高危患者在安全管理效率和護理質量方麵的影響。方法研髮“護理不良事件信息化管理繫統”,在此繫統應用7箇月後,選擇實施前2012年6-12月進行高危風險因素上報和處理的80例患者為對照組,選擇實施後2013年1-7月進行高危風險因素上報和處理的80例患者為觀察組,對兩組患者榦預處置時間和漏報率進行比較。結果觀察組榦預處置時間為(2.45±0.58)h,低于對照組的(3.46±0.54)h,差異有統計學意義(t=11.40,P<0.01);觀察組漏報率為5%,低于對照組的25%,差異有統計學意義(χ2=12.55,P<0.01)。結論護理不良事件信息化管理繫統實行以來起到良好的效果,在護理安全管理方麵有積極意義。
목적:탐토설계여응용호리불량사건신식화관리계통대가능발생호리불량사건적고위환자재안전관리효솔화호리질량방면적영향。방법연발“호리불량사건신식화관리계통”,재차계통응용7개월후,선택실시전2012년6-12월진행고위풍험인소상보화처리적80례환자위대조조,선택실시후2013년1-7월진행고위풍험인소상보화처리적80례환자위관찰조,대량조환자간예처치시간화루보솔진행비교。결과관찰조간예처치시간위(2.45±0.58)h,저우대조조적(3.46±0.54)h,차이유통계학의의(t=11.40,P<0.01);관찰조루보솔위5%,저우대조조적25%,차이유통계학의의(χ2=12.55,P<0.01)。결론호리불량사건신식화관리계통실행이래기도량호적효과,재호리안전관리방면유적겁의의。
Objective To explore the effect of the design and application of information management system of nursing adverse events on the efficiency of safety management and quality of nursing in patients with high risk of nursing adverse events .Methods The information management system of nursing adverse events was researched and developed , and the system was used for 7 months.Eighty patients who had been reported and handled as the high risk of nursing adverse events from June 2012 to December 2012 were chosen as the control group , and 80 patients with high risk from January 2013 to July 2013 after the implementation were chosen as the observation group .The intervention time and rate of missing report were compared between two groups.Results The intervention time was (2.45 ±0.58) h in the observation group, and was lower than (3.46 ±0.54) h in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=11.40,P<0.01). The rate of missing report was 5%in the observation group , and was lower than 25%in the control group , and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =12.55, P <0.01 ).Conclusions The implementation of information management system of nursing adverse events plays good results , and has positive significance in nursing safety management .