中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
21期
2659-2662
,共4页
腹膜透析%生活质量%患者满意度%电话跟踪访问
腹膜透析%生活質量%患者滿意度%電話跟蹤訪問
복막투석%생활질량%환자만의도%전화근종방문
Peritoneal dialysis%Quality of life%Patient satisfaction%Telephone visit
目的:探讨腹膜透析置管术后患者出院电话访问管理的效果。方法将67例腹膜透析置管术后患者,按随机数字表法随机分为干预组34例和对照组33例。对照组出院时给予常规健康教育,干预组在出院后给予电话跟踪访问,共5次,采用腹膜透析知识测评问卷、健康相关生活质量问卷、患者满意度调查表对两组患者进行调查,评价电话访问的效果。结果干预组知识掌握程度为优52.9%,良38.2%,差8.8%,对照组分别为24.2%,30.3%,45.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义( Z=-3.252, P=0.001);干预组患者睡眠、躯体活动、精力、疼痛、情绪反应、社会孤独感得分分别为(10.6±6.3),(8.9±5.2),(22.3±0.5),(18.6±7.3),(13.6±9.3),(15.7±7.6)分,均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为5.436,6.532,7.674,8.213,6.567,7.324;P<0.01);干预组患者对科主任、、主诊医师、普通护士满意度均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对腹膜透析患者出院后进行电话跟踪访问和指导,可以提升患者腹膜透析相关知识和技能,对患者的生活质量和医护人员的满意度均起到积极作用。
目的:探討腹膜透析置管術後患者齣院電話訪問管理的效果。方法將67例腹膜透析置管術後患者,按隨機數字錶法隨機分為榦預組34例和對照組33例。對照組齣院時給予常規健康教育,榦預組在齣院後給予電話跟蹤訪問,共5次,採用腹膜透析知識測評問捲、健康相關生活質量問捲、患者滿意度調查錶對兩組患者進行調查,評價電話訪問的效果。結果榦預組知識掌握程度為優52.9%,良38.2%,差8.8%,對照組分彆為24.2%,30.3%,45.5%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義( Z=-3.252, P=0.001);榦預組患者睡眠、軀體活動、精力、疼痛、情緒反應、社會孤獨感得分分彆為(10.6±6.3),(8.9±5.2),(22.3±0.5),(18.6±7.3),(13.6±9.3),(15.7±7.6)分,均低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為5.436,6.532,7.674,8.213,6.567,7.324;P<0.01);榦預組患者對科主任、、主診醫師、普通護士滿意度均高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對腹膜透析患者齣院後進行電話跟蹤訪問和指導,可以提升患者腹膜透析相關知識和技能,對患者的生活質量和醫護人員的滿意度均起到積極作用。
목적:탐토복막투석치관술후환자출원전화방문관리적효과。방법장67례복막투석치관술후환자,안수궤수자표법수궤분위간예조34례화대조조33례。대조조출원시급여상규건강교육,간예조재출원후급여전화근종방문,공5차,채용복막투석지식측평문권、건강상관생활질량문권、환자만의도조사표대량조환자진행조사,평개전화방문적효과。결과간예조지식장악정도위우52.9%,량38.2%,차8.8%,대조조분별위24.2%,30.3%,45.5%,량조비교차이유통계학의의( Z=-3.252, P=0.001);간예조환자수면、구체활동、정력、동통、정서반응、사회고독감득분분별위(10.6±6.3),(8.9±5.2),(22.3±0.5),(18.6±7.3),(13.6±9.3),(15.7±7.6)분,균저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(t치분별위5.436,6.532,7.674,8.213,6.567,7.324;P<0.01);간예조환자대과주임、、주진의사、보통호사만의도균고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대복막투석환자출원후진행전화근종방문화지도,가이제승환자복막투석상관지식화기능,대환자적생활질량화의호인원적만의도균기도적겁작용。
Objective To observe the effect of telephone visit for discharged patients with peritoneal dialysis catheter after surgery .Methods Sixty-seven patients with peritoneal dialysis catheter after surgery were chosen and were divided into the intervention group ( n=34 ) and the control group ( n=33 ) according to the random table .The control group received the routine health education at discharge , and the intervention group received the telephone visit ( 5 times ) after discharge .The effect of telephone visit was evaluated by the peritoneal dialysis knowledge assessment questionnaire , Nottingham health questionnarres and patient satisfaction questionnaire.Results The percent of the excellent, good, bad degrees of mastering the knowledge were respectively 52.9%, 38.2%, 8.8% in the intervention group, and were 24.2%, 30.3%, 45.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.252,P=0.001).The scores of sleep, physical activity, energy, pain, emotional reactions, social loneliness were respectively (10.6 ±6.3), (8.9 ±5.2), (22.3 ±0.5), (18.6 ±7.3), (13.6 ±9.3), (15.7 ±7.6) in the intervention group, and were lower than those in the control group , and the differences were statistically significant ( t =5.436,6.532,7.674, 8.213,6.567,7.324, respectively; P<0.01).The patient satisfaction in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group , and the satisfaction of director of department , the chief nurse , the attending doctor and the ordinary nurses were increased (P<0.05).Conclusions The telephone visit and guide for discharged patients with peritoneal dialysis catheter after surgery can increase their related knowledge and skill of peritoneal dialysis , and play a positive role in the life quality of patient and satisfaction with doctors and nurses .