中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
25期
3249-3251
,共3页
陈亚飞%邓丽%肖归%邢蓓蓓%张秀英
陳亞飛%鄧麗%肖歸%邢蓓蓓%張秀英
진아비%산려%초귀%형배배%장수영
应对方式%评判性思维%护理本科生
應對方式%評判性思維%護理本科生
응대방식%평판성사유%호리본과생
Coping style%Critical thinking%Nursing undergraduates student
目的:探讨护理本科生应对方式与评判性思维的关系,为引导护生采取正确的应对方式提高评判性思维能力提供有力的证据。方法采用评判性思维量表( CTDI-CV )、简易应对方式量表( SCSQ)对吉林大学护理学院63名2010级护理本科生进行调查。结果本组护理本科生CTDI-CV总分平均为(278.35±33.14)分,其中<280分者占58.73%,280~350分者占36.51%,>350分者占4.76%;护理本科生积极应对方式得分(1.86±0.626)分,高于国内常模,但差异无统计学意义( t =0.207,P>0.05),消极应对方式得分(1.18±0.566)分,低于国内常模,差异有统计学意义(t=-5.745, P<0.01)。护理本科生积极应对方式与CTDI-CV总分呈正相关(P<0.05),消极应对方式与CTDI-CV总分呈负相关(P<0.01)。消极应对方式与评判性思维各维度均呈不同程度的负相关,积极应对方式与开放思想、系统化能力、自信心呈正相关(P<0.01)。结论培养护理本科生积极的应对方式有助于提高护生评判性思维能力。
目的:探討護理本科生應對方式與評判性思維的關繫,為引導護生採取正確的應對方式提高評判性思維能力提供有力的證據。方法採用評判性思維量錶( CTDI-CV )、簡易應對方式量錶( SCSQ)對吉林大學護理學院63名2010級護理本科生進行調查。結果本組護理本科生CTDI-CV總分平均為(278.35±33.14)分,其中<280分者佔58.73%,280~350分者佔36.51%,>350分者佔4.76%;護理本科生積極應對方式得分(1.86±0.626)分,高于國內常模,但差異無統計學意義( t =0.207,P>0.05),消極應對方式得分(1.18±0.566)分,低于國內常模,差異有統計學意義(t=-5.745, P<0.01)。護理本科生積極應對方式與CTDI-CV總分呈正相關(P<0.05),消極應對方式與CTDI-CV總分呈負相關(P<0.01)。消極應對方式與評判性思維各維度均呈不同程度的負相關,積極應對方式與開放思想、繫統化能力、自信心呈正相關(P<0.01)。結論培養護理本科生積極的應對方式有助于提高護生評判性思維能力。
목적:탐토호리본과생응대방식여평판성사유적관계,위인도호생채취정학적응대방식제고평판성사유능력제공유력적증거。방법채용평판성사유량표( CTDI-CV )、간역응대방식량표( SCSQ)대길림대학호이학원63명2010급호리본과생진행조사。결과본조호리본과생CTDI-CV총분평균위(278.35±33.14)분,기중<280분자점58.73%,280~350분자점36.51%,>350분자점4.76%;호리본과생적겁응대방식득분(1.86±0.626)분,고우국내상모,단차이무통계학의의( t =0.207,P>0.05),소겁응대방식득분(1.18±0.566)분,저우국내상모,차이유통계학의의(t=-5.745, P<0.01)。호리본과생적겁응대방식여CTDI-CV총분정정상관(P<0.05),소겁응대방식여CTDI-CV총분정부상관(P<0.01)。소겁응대방식여평판성사유각유도균정불동정도적부상관,적겁응대방식여개방사상、계통화능력、자신심정정상관(P<0.01)。결론배양호리본과생적겁적응대방식유조우제고호생평판성사유능력。
Objective To explore the relation between coping style and critical thinking among nursing students in order to provide the powerful evidence for instructing nursing students to take the correct coping style so as to improve their critical thinking .Methods Sixty-three nursing students in Grade 2010 in School of Nursing, Jilin University were surveyed by critical thinking disposition inventory ( CTDI-CV) and simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ).Results The average score of CTDI-CV was (278.35 ±33.14) in the nursing students, and the percent of students with less than 280 was 58.73%, and the percent of students with 280 to 350 was 36.51%, and the percent of students with more than 350 was 4.76%.The score of positive coping styles in the nursing students was (1.86 ±0.626), and was higher than that of the national norm , and the difference was not statistically significant (t =0.207,P>0.05).The score of negative coping styles in the nursing students was (1.18 ±0.566), and was lower than that of the national norm , and the difference was statistically significant (t=-5.745,P <0.01).Nursing undergraduates positive coping style was positively correlated with CTDI-CV scores ( P<0.05), negative coping styles and negatively correlated with CTDI-CV scores (P<0.01).Negative coping style and the critical mind all dimensions are in different degree of negative correlation, positive coping styles and open mind , systematic ability, self-confidence were positively correlated (P<0.01).Conclusions Developing positive coping styles in the nursing students can improve their critical thinking .