中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2014年
26期
3320-3323
,共4页
范凤燕%刘霞%李海燕%丁育红
範鳳燕%劉霞%李海燕%丁育紅
범봉연%류하%리해연%정육홍
腹膜透析%PBL%健康教育%生存质量
腹膜透析%PBL%健康教育%生存質量
복막투석%PBL%건강교육%생존질량
Peritoneal dialysis%PBL%Health education%Life quality
目的:探讨PBL健康教育模式对维持性腹膜透析患者生存质量的影响。方法选择维持性腹膜透析患者46例,按随机数字表分为对照组( n=22)和PBL组( n=24)。对照组采用传统健康教育方法,PBL组采用PBL健康教育模式,干预6个月后采用治疗依从性评价表以及肾脏疾病生存质量专用量表( KDQOL-SF)比较两组患者治疗依从性和生存质量。结果干预6个月后,PBL组患者治疗依从性得分为(3.88±0.78)分,对照组为(2.91±0.73)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=4.344,P<0.05);干预后PBL组KDTA总分(51.40±9.24)分,SF-36总分(49.39±6.17)分,均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义( t值分别为2.614,3.928;P<0.05)。结论 PBL健康教育模式符合维持性腹膜透析患者这一特殊群体的健康教育特点,有助提高生存质量,值得在临床护理中推广应用。
目的:探討PBL健康教育模式對維持性腹膜透析患者生存質量的影響。方法選擇維持性腹膜透析患者46例,按隨機數字錶分為對照組( n=22)和PBL組( n=24)。對照組採用傳統健康教育方法,PBL組採用PBL健康教育模式,榦預6箇月後採用治療依從性評價錶以及腎髒疾病生存質量專用量錶( KDQOL-SF)比較兩組患者治療依從性和生存質量。結果榦預6箇月後,PBL組患者治療依從性得分為(3.88±0.78)分,對照組為(2.91±0.73)分,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(t=4.344,P<0.05);榦預後PBL組KDTA總分(51.40±9.24)分,SF-36總分(49.39±6.17)分,均高于對照組,差異有統計學意義( t值分彆為2.614,3.928;P<0.05)。結論 PBL健康教育模式符閤維持性腹膜透析患者這一特殊群體的健康教育特點,有助提高生存質量,值得在臨床護理中推廣應用。
목적:탐토PBL건강교육모식대유지성복막투석환자생존질량적영향。방법선택유지성복막투석환자46례,안수궤수자표분위대조조( n=22)화PBL조( n=24)。대조조채용전통건강교육방법,PBL조채용PBL건강교육모식,간예6개월후채용치료의종성평개표이급신장질병생존질량전용량표( KDQOL-SF)비교량조환자치료의종성화생존질량。결과간예6개월후,PBL조환자치료의종성득분위(3.88±0.78)분,대조조위(2.91±0.73)분,량조비교차이유통계학의의(t=4.344,P<0.05);간예후PBL조KDTA총분(51.40±9.24)분,SF-36총분(49.39±6.17)분,균고우대조조,차이유통계학의의( t치분별위2.614,3.928;P<0.05)。결론 PBL건강교육모식부합유지성복막투석환자저일특수군체적건강교육특점,유조제고생존질량,치득재림상호리중추엄응용。
Objective To explore the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) health educational model on life quality of maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients .Methods Forty-six maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients in our hospital were chosen and divided into the control group ( n =22 ) and the experimental group (n=24).The control group received the routine health education , and the experimental group received the PBL health educational model .The treatment compliance and life quality of patients were assessed by the treatment compliance evaluation scale and KDQOL-SF questionnaire survey between two groups 6 months after the intervention.Results The treatment compliance 6 months after the intervention was (3.88 ±0.78) in the experimental group, and was (2.91 ±0.73) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.344,P<0.05).The scores of KDTA and SF-36 were respectively (51.40 ±9.24) and (49.39 ±6.17) in the experimental group after intervention , and were higher than those of the control group , and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.614,3.928, respectively;P<0.05).Conclusions PBL health educational model is in accord with the characteristics of health education among maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients , and can improve their life quality, and is worthy of clinical promotion .