临床眼科杂志
臨床眼科雜誌
림상안과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2014年
5期
439-441
,共3页
白内障手术%虹膜松驰综合征%瞳孔扩张器
白內障手術%虹膜鬆馳綜閤徵%瞳孔擴張器
백내장수술%홍막송치종합정%동공확장기
Cataract surgery%Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome%Pupil dilator
目的:比较前房内注入肾上腺素联合利多卡因和应用瞳孔扩张器两种方式处置虹膜松驰综合征(IFIS)的有效性。方法43例(43只眼)发生IFIS患者中,25例采用前房内注入0.1%肾上腺素联合0.5%利多卡因处置,18例采用瞳孔扩张器处置,观察虹膜涌动、瞳孔缩小及虹膜脱出的改善程度。结果25例IFIS患者采用前房内注入0.1%肾上腺素联合0.5%利多卡因处置,仅9例(36.0%)恢复瞳孔扩张状态,其中11例虹膜脱出者中仅2例(18.2%)未再发生虹膜脱出;18例IFIS患者采用瞳孔扩张器处置,均恢复瞳孔扩张状态(100.0%),其中8例虹膜脱出者仅1例(12.5%)术中未再发生虹膜脱出。结论前房内注入肾上腺素联合利多卡因不能有效阻止IFIS的发生,对手术操作帮助不大;瞳孔扩张器能有效阻止虹膜涌动及瞳孔缩小,降低手术难度,但不能有效防止虹膜脱出,应特别注意。
目的:比較前房內註入腎上腺素聯閤利多卡因和應用瞳孔擴張器兩種方式處置虹膜鬆馳綜閤徵(IFIS)的有效性。方法43例(43隻眼)髮生IFIS患者中,25例採用前房內註入0.1%腎上腺素聯閤0.5%利多卡因處置,18例採用瞳孔擴張器處置,觀察虹膜湧動、瞳孔縮小及虹膜脫齣的改善程度。結果25例IFIS患者採用前房內註入0.1%腎上腺素聯閤0.5%利多卡因處置,僅9例(36.0%)恢複瞳孔擴張狀態,其中11例虹膜脫齣者中僅2例(18.2%)未再髮生虹膜脫齣;18例IFIS患者採用瞳孔擴張器處置,均恢複瞳孔擴張狀態(100.0%),其中8例虹膜脫齣者僅1例(12.5%)術中未再髮生虹膜脫齣。結論前房內註入腎上腺素聯閤利多卡因不能有效阻止IFIS的髮生,對手術操作幫助不大;瞳孔擴張器能有效阻止虹膜湧動及瞳孔縮小,降低手術難度,但不能有效防止虹膜脫齣,應特彆註意。
목적:비교전방내주입신상선소연합리다잡인화응용동공확장기량충방식처치홍막송치종합정(IFIS)적유효성。방법43례(43지안)발생IFIS환자중,25례채용전방내주입0.1%신상선소연합0.5%리다잡인처치,18례채용동공확장기처치,관찰홍막용동、동공축소급홍막탈출적개선정도。결과25례IFIS환자채용전방내주입0.1%신상선소연합0.5%리다잡인처치,부9례(36.0%)회복동공확장상태,기중11례홍막탈출자중부2례(18.2%)미재발생홍막탈출;18례IFIS환자채용동공확장기처치,균회복동공확장상태(100.0%),기중8례홍막탈출자부1례(12.5%)술중미재발생홍막탈출。결론전방내주입신상선소연합리다잡인불능유효조지IFIS적발생,대수술조작방조불대;동공확장기능유효조지홍막용동급동공축소,강저수술난도,단불능유효방지홍막탈출,응특별주의。
Objective To compare the effects of anterior chamber injection of lidocaine 0.1% and epinephrine 0.5%( ILE) versus conventional pupil dilator on intraoperative floppy iris syndrome ( IFIS) .Methods Two methods were employed to manage 43 eyes presented with IFIS .Twenty-five of 43 eyes were treated with ILE and 18 of 43 eyes were man-aged with pupil dilator .Presence of pupil constriction , billowing iris and iris prolapse was compared between the two groups of patients.Results In 25 eyes treated with ILE, nine (36.0%) showed sustained pupillary dilatation .There were 11 eyes presented with iris prolapse in this group , and iris restored in only 2 eyes (18.2%).In contrast, in 18 eyes managed with pupil dilator , all maintained pupil dilation during the surgery .There were 8 eyes presented with iris prolapse , and iris restored in only one (12.5%) eye.Conclusions ILE is ineffective in most IFIS cases .Pupil dilator is the most reliable means of maintaining a safe pupil diameter during cataract surgery .However, pupil dilator could not prevent iris prolapse .