口腔颌面外科杂志
口腔頜麵外科雜誌
구강합면외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
2014年
5期
370-373
,共4页
上颌后牙%短种植体%上颌窦底提升术%患者满意度
上頜後牙%短種植體%上頜竇底提升術%患者滿意度
상합후아%단충식체%상합두저제승술%환자만의도
maxillary posterior teeth%short implant%maxillary sinus floor augmentation%the satisfaction of patients
目的:对上颌后牙缺失后,分别经短种植体与上颌窦底提升术修复患者的临床满意度进行比较分析。方法:对临床上颌后牙缺失患者采取不同的种植修复方式:短种植体或经上颌窦底提升术后植入常规植体。分别于术前1个月及负重后3个月、1年、2年及3年对患者进行问卷调查,通过可视化量表进行满意度定量测量。调查内容包括:进食质量、进食习惯及情绪。比较2种种植修复方法的临床疗效。结果:10名患者植入短种植体16枚(长度6、8 mm),13名患者进行上颌窦底提升同期植入10 mm以上种植体15枚,2组患者修复负重后的满意度评分无统计学差异,但是患者自身对手术的感觉差异明显。结论:患者对两种不同方式修复上颌后牙缺失的满意度没有差异,但短种植体可以简化种植手术流程并减少术中痛苦。
目的:對上頜後牙缺失後,分彆經短種植體與上頜竇底提升術脩複患者的臨床滿意度進行比較分析。方法:對臨床上頜後牙缺失患者採取不同的種植脩複方式:短種植體或經上頜竇底提升術後植入常規植體。分彆于術前1箇月及負重後3箇月、1年、2年及3年對患者進行問捲調查,通過可視化量錶進行滿意度定量測量。調查內容包括:進食質量、進食習慣及情緒。比較2種種植脩複方法的臨床療效。結果:10名患者植入短種植體16枚(長度6、8 mm),13名患者進行上頜竇底提升同期植入10 mm以上種植體15枚,2組患者脩複負重後的滿意度評分無統計學差異,但是患者自身對手術的感覺差異明顯。結論:患者對兩種不同方式脩複上頜後牙缺失的滿意度沒有差異,但短種植體可以簡化種植手術流程併減少術中痛苦。
목적:대상합후아결실후,분별경단충식체여상합두저제승술수복환자적림상만의도진행비교분석。방법:대림상상합후아결실환자채취불동적충식수복방식:단충식체혹경상합두저제승술후식입상규식체。분별우술전1개월급부중후3개월、1년、2년급3년대환자진행문권조사,통과가시화량표진행만의도정량측량。조사내용포괄:진식질량、진식습관급정서。비교2충충식수복방법적림상료효。결과:10명환자식입단충식체16매(장도6、8 mm),13명환자진행상합두저제승동기식입10 mm이상충식체15매,2조환자수복부중후적만의도평분무통계학차이,단시환자자신대수술적감각차이명현。결론:환자대량충불동방식수복상합후아결실적만의도몰유차이,단단충식체가이간화충식수술류정병감소술중통고。
Objective: To compare the clinical satisfaction of patients which lost maxillary posterior teeth rehabilitated by short implant-supported prosthesis and maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Methods: 10 patients rehabilitated by 16 short implant-supported prothesis. 13 patients after sinus floor augmentation rehabilitated by 15 regular implant-supported prosthesis. At 1 month before and 3 months, 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year after loading of implant prosthesis, visual analog scale (VAS) was used to elicit patient responses including SAT-P (Satisfaction Profile) items: quality of eating, eating behavior, eating mood. The clinical score was analyzed by SPSS, P<0.05 were considered significant. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups after implant-supported prosthesis. But patient's feeling of operation in 2 groups was significantly different. Conclusion: There is no difference in level of satisfaction in patients with the two different kinds of implant-supported prosthesis in maxillary posterior teeth.