辽宁医学院学报
遼寧醫學院學報
료녕의학원학보
JOURNAL OF LIAONING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
5期
53-55
,共3页
全关节置换翻新术%假体%固定方式%影响
全關節置換翻新術%假體%固定方式%影響
전관절치환번신술%가체%고정방식%영향
total joint replacement%prosthesis%fixation%effect
目的:探析影响全关节置换翻新术临床效果的相关因素。方法以我院2011年8月至2013年8月期间来我院接受治疗的80例行全关节置换翻新术的患者作为研究对象展开回顾性分析,将所有患者的资料汇总,探析影响全关节置换翻新术临床效果的因素。结果55例手术成功病例中,置换翻新术之间的间隔时间为(2.4±0.9)年,而失败病例则为(5.3±2.3)年,对比差异明显;55例手术成功病例中,21例(38.18%)患者存在原发性、继发性或者是风湿性关节炎等骨性疾病,34例(61.82%)患者采取骨水泥固定方式;25例失败病例中,存在骨性疾病的患者为17例(68.00%),仅11例(44.00%)患者采取骨水泥固定方式,对比均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论关节炎等骨性疾病方面、固定方式以及置换术的间隔时间等因素对全膝关节置换翻新术的治疗结果有着重要影响。为确保患者的治疗效果并改善预后,以免患者正常生活受到影响,手术时应该重视以上问题,尽量采用骨水泥固定方式,使用合适的翻修假体,并选择临床经验丰富的医师进行手术。
目的:探析影響全關節置換翻新術臨床效果的相關因素。方法以我院2011年8月至2013年8月期間來我院接受治療的80例行全關節置換翻新術的患者作為研究對象展開迴顧性分析,將所有患者的資料彙總,探析影響全關節置換翻新術臨床效果的因素。結果55例手術成功病例中,置換翻新術之間的間隔時間為(2.4±0.9)年,而失敗病例則為(5.3±2.3)年,對比差異明顯;55例手術成功病例中,21例(38.18%)患者存在原髮性、繼髮性或者是風濕性關節炎等骨性疾病,34例(61.82%)患者採取骨水泥固定方式;25例失敗病例中,存在骨性疾病的患者為17例(68.00%),僅11例(44.00%)患者採取骨水泥固定方式,對比均具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論關節炎等骨性疾病方麵、固定方式以及置換術的間隔時間等因素對全膝關節置換翻新術的治療結果有著重要影響。為確保患者的治療效果併改善預後,以免患者正常生活受到影響,手術時應該重視以上問題,儘量採用骨水泥固定方式,使用閤適的翻脩假體,併選擇臨床經驗豐富的醫師進行手術。
목적:탐석영향전관절치환번신술림상효과적상관인소。방법이아원2011년8월지2013년8월기간래아원접수치료적80례행전관절치환번신술적환자작위연구대상전개회고성분석,장소유환자적자료회총,탐석영향전관절치환번신술림상효과적인소。결과55례수술성공병례중,치환번신술지간적간격시간위(2.4±0.9)년,이실패병례칙위(5.3±2.3)년,대비차이명현;55례수술성공병례중,21례(38.18%)환자존재원발성、계발성혹자시풍습성관절염등골성질병,34례(61.82%)환자채취골수니고정방식;25례실패병례중,존재골성질병적환자위17례(68.00%),부11례(44.00%)환자채취골수니고정방식,대비균구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론관절염등골성질병방면、고정방식이급치환술적간격시간등인소대전슬관절치환번신술적치료결과유착중요영향。위학보환자적치료효과병개선예후,이면환자정상생활수도영향,수술시응해중시이상문제,진량채용골수니고정방식,사용합괄적번수가체,병선택림상경험봉부적의사진행수술。
Objective To explore factors affecting the clinical effects of total joint replacement surgery. Method 80 patients were taken as the research object for total joint replacement operation in our hospital from August 2011 to August 2011. All patients’ data were analyzed and summarized, and the factors influencing clinical effects of total joint replacement surgery were detected. Results For the 55 cases of successful operation, the interval time between replacement operations is (2. 4+0. 9) years, and that of the failure cases is (5. 3+2. 3) years, there is obvious significant difference; in 55 cases of successful operation, 21 cases (38. 18% ) were with bony disease such as primary, secondary or rheumatoid arthritis, and 34 cases (61. 82% ) were treated by bone cement fixation, a-mong the 25 failure cases, 17 cases were with bony disease (68. 00% ), only 11 cases (44. 00% ) with bone cement fixation, and this contrast were statistically significant (P<0. 05). Conclusion Factors playing vital roles in the treatment of total knee replacement in-clude bony diseases like arthritis, fixation and replacement interval . In order to ensure the treatment effect, improve patients’ progno-sis, and avoid patients’ normal life being affected, issues listed above should be taken into consideration. In operation, bone cement fixation, appropriate prosthesis, and experienced doctors should be preferred.