黄金科学技术
黃金科學技術
황금과학기술
GOLD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
2014年
5期
69-73
,共5页
万孝衡%王新民%朱阳亚%姜志良%陈秋松
萬孝衡%王新民%硃暘亞%薑誌良%陳鞦鬆
만효형%왕신민%주양아%강지량%진추송
采场结构参数%评判指标%组合赋权%层次分析法%熵权法%TOPSIS法
採場結構參數%評判指標%組閤賦權%層次分析法%熵權法%TOPSIS法
채장결구삼수%평판지표%조합부권%층차분석법%적권법%TOPSIS법
stope structural parameters%evaluation index%empowerment combination%analytic hierarchy process (AHP)%entropy weigh method(EM)%TOPSIS method
为解决运用数值分析方法获得最优采场结构参数中权重确定的难点,提出了一种基于组合赋权的逼近理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)综合评判方法。综合考虑影响采场结构参数中经济、技术、安全三大类因素,运用层次分析原理建立采场结构参数的评判体系,采用熵权法和层次分析法确定采场结构参数中各指标的组合权重,计算出各采场结构参数方案基于评判指标的综合优越度,实现采场结构参数的优选。最后,以湖南某矿山的采场结构参数选择为实例,建立了9种备选方案,得出5种安全可行方案的优越度分别为:方案2,40.8%;方案3,70.2%;方案5,26.8%;方案6,52.9%;方案8,4.7%,从而确定方案3最优。
為解決運用數值分析方法穫得最優採場結構參數中權重確定的難點,提齣瞭一種基于組閤賦權的逼近理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)綜閤評判方法。綜閤攷慮影響採場結構參數中經濟、技術、安全三大類因素,運用層次分析原理建立採場結構參數的評判體繫,採用熵權法和層次分析法確定採場結構參數中各指標的組閤權重,計算齣各採場結構參數方案基于評判指標的綜閤優越度,實現採場結構參數的優選。最後,以湖南某礦山的採場結構參數選擇為實例,建立瞭9種備選方案,得齣5種安全可行方案的優越度分彆為:方案2,40.8%;方案3,70.2%;方案5,26.8%;方案6,52.9%;方案8,4.7%,從而確定方案3最優。
위해결운용수치분석방법획득최우채장결구삼수중권중학정적난점,제출료일충기우조합부권적핍근이상해적배서법(TOPSIS)종합평판방법。종합고필영향채장결구삼수중경제、기술、안전삼대류인소,운용층차분석원리건립채장결구삼수적평판체계,채용적권법화층차분석법학정채장결구삼수중각지표적조합권중,계산출각채장결구삼수방안기우평판지표적종합우월도,실현채장결구삼수적우선。최후,이호남모광산적채장결구삼수선택위실례,건립료9충비선방안,득출5충안전가행방안적우월도분별위:방안2,40.8%;방안3,70.2%;방안5,26.8%;방안6,52.9%;방안8,4.7%,종이학정방안3최우。
To solve the problem of the difficulty using numerical analysis method to obtain the optimal stope structure parameters of the weight,we propose a technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) based on combination of empowerment comprehensive evaluation method.Considering influence of stope structure parameters of the three categories of factors,such as economy,technology and safety.We establish t he evaluation system of a stope structure parameters by the principle of analytic hierarchy process ,determine combination and weights of each indicator using the entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process(AHP), and calculate the superior degrees of schemes based on the comprehensive evaluation index,finally,realizing, optimization of stope structure parameters.Taking the example of a mine in Hunan Province,nine schemes,fitting an orthogonal model,were tested,five of the nine schemes were assessed by empowerment combination TOPSIS evaluation model.The synthetic superior degrees of schemes are 40.8%,70.2%,26.8%,52.9%and 4.7%for the second, third,fifth,sixth and eighth ones,respectively,and the third scheme becomes the best.