CAJ | 학술논문

为了评估《新标准大学英语视听说教程》作为教材在普通本科院校的适用性，笔者采用对照法，综合《大学英语课程教学要求》中对听力的要求，以及研究者们提出的评估大学英语教材的标准，形成一个新的评估清单，将教程与该清单一一作了比较。结果表明：《教程》编写质量很高，语料真实、题材丰富、极具时代感，体裁多样、内容有趣、编排有序、利于自学。但生词比率太大、语速较快、文本过长，对于普通本科院校非英语专业大一、大二的学生来讲难度过高。建议可将其用于四级后学生或英语基础非常好的学生群或重点院校。
위료평고《신표준대학영어시은설교정》작위교재재보통본과원교적괄용성，필자채용대조법，종합《대학영어과정교학요구》중대은력적요구，이급연구자문제출적평고대학영어교재적표준，형성일개신적평고청단，장교정여해청단일일작료비교。결과표명：《교정》편사질량흔고，어료진실、제재봉부、겁구시대감，체재다양、내용유취、편배유서、리우자학。단생사비솔태대、어속교쾌、문본과장，대우보통본과원교비영어전업대일、대이적학생래강난도과고。건의가장기용우사급후학생혹영어기출비상호적학생군혹중점원교。
In order to find out whether New Standard College English: Real Communication Listening and Speaking is applicable in average colleges as listening textbook, this paper adopts the matching method proposed by Hutchinson and Waters to compare this textbook with a checklist based on College English Curriculum Requirements and some criteria of college English listening textbook suggested by several experts. The result shows this textbook is of high quality, with natural and authentic language, wonderful and fashionable materials, various and diverse genre and etc. However, it’s too difficult for freshmen and sophomores of non-English majors because of too many new vocabulary, fast speaking speed and lengthy listening material. It could be used in those key universities or among students who have passed CET 4 or those who have excellent English foundation.