CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨无保护会阴接生法与传统接生法对会阴裂伤程度的效果比较。方法选取我院2013年11月～2014年3月间接收的516例临产妇作为观察对象，随机分为观察组和对照组各258例，观察组采取无保护会阴接生法，对照组采用传统接生法，比较两组产妇会阴裂伤程度。结果对照组产妇的会阴裂伤程度明显比观察组严重，比较有明显差异，P ＜0.05。结论无保护会阴接生法相对于传统接生法能够明显降低产妇的会阴撕裂程度。
목적：탐토무보호회음접생법여전통접생법대회음렬상정도적효과비교。방법선취아원2013년11월～2014년3월간접수적516례임산부작위관찰대상，수궤분위관찰조화대조조각258례，관찰조채취무보호회음접생법，대조조채용전통접생법，비교량조산부회음렬상정도。결과대조조산부적회음렬상정도명현비관찰조엄중，비교유명현차이，P ＜0.05。결론무보호회음접생법상대우전통접생법능구명현강저산부적회음시렬정도。
Objective To explore the perineal laceration degree by comparing unprotected perineum delivery and traditional delivery. Method 516 parturients received from November 2013 to March 2014 in our hospital were selected as observation objectives by dividing them into observation group and control with 258 patients respectively. The unprotected perineum delivery was adopted for observation group while control group adopted the traditional delivery, and then perineal laceration degrees of the two groups would be compared. Result The perineal laceration of parturients in control group was much more serious than that of observation group with a difference P<0.05. Conclusion Unprotected perineum delivery can better reduce perineal laceration degree compared to traditional delivery.