中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
9期
927-929
,共3页
李欣%刘超群%浦江%付山峰%罗哲%李辉%孙涛
李訢%劉超群%浦江%付山峰%囉哲%李輝%孫濤
리흔%류초군%포강%부산봉%라철%리휘%손도
主诊医师负责制%科室管理%教学管理%量化考核
主診醫師負責製%科室管理%教學管理%量化攷覈
주진의사부책제%과실관리%교학관리%양화고핵
Attending physician responsibility system%Department management%Teaching management%Quantitative assessment
目的:探讨主诊医师负责制用于科室教学管理的效果。方法采用教学管理量化评分标准对实施主诊医师负责制前后的8名带教教师进行评分,主诊医师负责制前12个月的评分资料为对照组,主诊医师负责制后12个月的评分资料为研究组。组间比较采用配对t检验,检验水准α=0.05。结果研究组医师的教学讲课、教学查房、病例讨论、病历质量、出科考核、总分均高于对照组医师得分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组带教评分与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组高、中级职称教师量化考核评分高于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论主诊医师负责制是提高教学管理水平的有效途径。
目的:探討主診醫師負責製用于科室教學管理的效果。方法採用教學管理量化評分標準對實施主診醫師負責製前後的8名帶教教師進行評分,主診醫師負責製前12箇月的評分資料為對照組,主診醫師負責製後12箇月的評分資料為研究組。組間比較採用配對t檢驗,檢驗水準α=0.05。結果研究組醫師的教學講課、教學查房、病例討論、病歷質量、齣科攷覈、總分均高于對照組醫師得分,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);研究組帶教評分與對照組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);研究組高、中級職稱教師量化攷覈評分高于對照組,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論主診醫師負責製是提高教學管理水平的有效途徑。
목적:탐토주진의사부책제용우과실교학관리적효과。방법채용교학관리양화평분표준대실시주진의사부책제전후적8명대교교사진행평분,주진의사부책제전12개월적평분자료위대조조,주진의사부책제후12개월적평분자료위연구조。조간비교채용배대t검험,검험수준α=0.05。결과연구조의사적교학강과、교학사방、병례토론、병력질량、출과고핵、총분균고우대조조의사득분,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);연구조대교평분여대조조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);연구조고、중급직칭교사양화고핵평분고우대조조,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론주진의사부책제시제고교학관리수평적유효도경。
Objective To evaluate the effect of the department teaching management by using attending physician responsibility system. Methods Eight teachers were scored using the teaching management quantitative scoring standard before and after the implementation ofattending physician responsibility system. Score data of 12 months before the implementation ofattending physician respon-sibility system was defined as the control group, while the score data of 12 months after the implemen-tation ofattending physician responsibility system was defined as the study group. Groups were compared by using the paired t-test and P<0.05 means the difference has statistics significance. Results Com-pared with the control group , there was significant statistical difference between the two groups in teaching lectures, teaching rounds, case discussions, medical recordsquality, departmental rotation examination and the total score ( P<0 . 05 ) . No statistical difference was observed between the two groups on teaching score(P>0.05). Compared with the control group, there was significant statistical difference between the two groups in the senior grade and intermediate grade (P<0.05). Conclusion The attending physician responsibility systemfor teaching management is an effective way to improve the teaching management level.