中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2014年
9期
869-873
,共5页
宓伟%练武%石塔拉%衣卫杰%韩文婷
宓偉%練武%石塔拉%衣衛傑%韓文婷
복위%련무%석탑랍%의위걸%한문정
形成性评价%营养与食品卫生学%实施效果
形成性評價%營養與食品衛生學%實施效果
형성성평개%영양여식품위생학%실시효과
Formative assessment%Nutrition and food hygiene%Implementation effect
目的:分析形成性评价在营养与食品卫生学中的实施效果。方法选择2010级预防医学专业1班55名学生为对照组,2班56名学生为实验组,分别进行终结性评价和形成性评价,通过考试成绩和调查问卷分析结果。采用SPSS 17.0软件分析,计量资料采用x±s表示,采用t检验、字2检验、秩和检验、一元线性相关分析进行统计分析,检验水准α=0.05。结果实验组学生实验成绩、期末成绩明显高于对照组学生成绩,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.001、0.000);实验组学生总评成绩更接近负偏态分布,平均成绩为89分明显高于对照组平均成绩79分(P<0.01),且平时成绩与期末成绩呈正相关(r=0.865,P<0.001)。调查问卷结果显示,学生认同形成性评价在教学过程中的应用。结论形成性评价提高了营养与食品卫生学教学质量。
目的:分析形成性評價在營養與食品衛生學中的實施效果。方法選擇2010級預防醫學專業1班55名學生為對照組,2班56名學生為實驗組,分彆進行終結性評價和形成性評價,通過攷試成績和調查問捲分析結果。採用SPSS 17.0軟件分析,計量資料採用x±s錶示,採用t檢驗、字2檢驗、秩和檢驗、一元線性相關分析進行統計分析,檢驗水準α=0.05。結果實驗組學生實驗成績、期末成績明顯高于對照組學生成績,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P值分彆為0.001、0.000);實驗組學生總評成績更接近負偏態分佈,平均成績為89分明顯高于對照組平均成績79分(P<0.01),且平時成績與期末成績呈正相關(r=0.865,P<0.001)。調查問捲結果顯示,學生認同形成性評價在教學過程中的應用。結論形成性評價提高瞭營養與食品衛生學教學質量。
목적:분석형성성평개재영양여식품위생학중적실시효과。방법선택2010급예방의학전업1반55명학생위대조조,2반56명학생위실험조,분별진행종결성평개화형성성평개,통과고시성적화조사문권분석결과。채용SPSS 17.0연건분석,계량자료채용x±s표시,채용t검험、자2검험、질화검험、일원선성상관분석진행통계분석,검험수준α=0.05。결과실험조학생실험성적、기말성적명현고우대조조학생성적,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P치분별위0.001、0.000);실험조학생총평성적경접근부편태분포,평균성적위89분명현고우대조조평균성적79분(P<0.01),차평시성적여기말성적정정상관(r=0.865,P<0.001)。조사문권결과현시,학생인동형성성평개재교학과정중적응용。결론형성성평개제고료영양여식품위생학교학질량。
Objective To analyze the implementation effect of formative assessment in nutri-tion and food hygiene. Methods 55 students of Class One from grade 2010 majoring in preventive medicine were taken as the control group, with 56 students of Class Two as the experimental group.The control group used the summative assessment , while the experimental group used the formative assessment. Results were analyzed by course examinations and questionnaire surveys. SPSS 17.0 soft-ware was used and the measurement data were expressed by x±s. Statistical analysis was performed using t test, test, rank sum test, a Yuan linear correlation analysis, with the level of test α=0.05. Results The experimental scores and final scores of experimental group students were significantly higher than the control group and the difference was statistically significant(P values were 0.001, 0.000). The experimental group's overall result is closer to the negative skewed distribution. The ex-perimental group's average score of 89 points is significantly higher than the control group's average score of 79 points(P<0.01), and the usual results and the final results were positively correlated(r=0.865, P<0.001). The survey indicated that the students recognized the application of formative assess-ment in teaching process . Conclusion Formative assessment can help improve the teaching and learning quality in nutrition and food hygiene.