CAJ | 학술논문

第三方开发广告过滤软件引发的问题备受关注。从反不正当竞争法的角度分析，第三方开发广告过滤软件的行为并不构成不正当竞争。从著作权法的角度分析，在网络服务提供者的含有广告的网页构成汇编作品的情形，用户使用广告过滤软件可能侵犯汇编作品的完整权，广告过滤软件的开发者可能构成引诱侵权，浏览器运营者可能构成帮助侵权，但可以考虑适用类似“通知+移除”的规则。从第三人侵害债权的角度分析，广告过滤软件的开发者、用户、浏览器运营者可能构成第三人侵害债权。此外，还可以考虑通过立法的方式划定各方权利边界来实现各方利益新一轮的平衡。
제삼방개발엄고과려연건인발적문제비수관주。종반불정당경쟁법적각도분석，제삼방개발엄고과려연건적행위병불구성불정당경쟁。종저작권법적각도분석，재망락복무제공자적함유엄고적망혈구성회편작품적정형，용호사용엄고과려연건가능침범회편작품적완정권，엄고과려연건적개발자가능구성인유침권，류람기운영자가능구성방조침권，단가이고필괄용유사“통지+이제”적규칙。종제삼인침해채권적각도분석，엄고과려연건적개발자、용호、류람기운영자가능구성제삼인침해채권。차외，환가이고필통과입법적방식화정각방권리변계래실현각방이익신일륜적평형。
There is a widespread attention on the issue caused by ads-skipping software developed by third party. From the perspective of Anti-Unfair Competition Law, third party develops the ads-skipping software is not unfair competition. From the perspective of Copyright Law, if the web which contained advertisements of internet service providers is compilation works, users who installe the ads-skipping software may infringe the right of integrity, software developers may be responsible for inducement infringement, explorer operators may be responsible for contributory infringement, which can be applied the similar rules like “Notice and Take down”. From the perspective of third party infringement of creditor's rights, the developers, users and explorer operators may be responsible for third party infringement of creditor's rights. In addition, in order to balance the interests among parties, it is advised to demarcate the boundary of rights through legislation.