中国卫生政策研究
中國衛生政策研究
중국위생정책연구
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY
2014年
10期
40-45
,共6页
董四平%左玉玲%陶红兵%李萌%郭淑岩%何柳%黎浩
董四平%左玉玲%陶紅兵%李萌%郭淑巖%何柳%黎浩
동사평%좌옥령%도홍병%리맹%곽숙암%하류%려호
数据包络分析%医院效率%分类研究%中国
數據包絡分析%醫院效率%分類研究%中國
수거포락분석%의원효솔%분류연구%중국
Data envelopment analysis%Hospital efficiency%Classification%China
目的:了解中国目前医院效率数据包络分析( DEA)研究现状,为进一步提升中国医院效率DEA研究水平提供参考。方法:对1984-2014年应用数据包络分析中国医院效率的85篇密切文献进行系统分类和综述,总结归纳文献的基本特点,对其投入产出指标进行归类统计,并与国际同类文献比较,评价中国此类研究的规范性。结果:应用DEA分析中国医院效率的研究存在医院配置效率研究文献缺乏、医院技术效率模型单一、投入产出指标筛选不严谨、误将经济类指标作为产出指标等突出问题。结论与建议:中国医院效率DEA研究方法使用的合理性、规范性有待进一步提高,研究与国际研究仍存在较大差距。建议相关研究者在医院效率DEA研究方面应追踪国际最新研究,科学筛选投入产出指标,深入分析使用方法和应用条件,提升中国医院效率DEA研究的规范性和科学性。
目的:瞭解中國目前醫院效率數據包絡分析( DEA)研究現狀,為進一步提升中國醫院效率DEA研究水平提供參攷。方法:對1984-2014年應用數據包絡分析中國醫院效率的85篇密切文獻進行繫統分類和綜述,總結歸納文獻的基本特點,對其投入產齣指標進行歸類統計,併與國際同類文獻比較,評價中國此類研究的規範性。結果:應用DEA分析中國醫院效率的研究存在醫院配置效率研究文獻缺乏、醫院技術效率模型單一、投入產齣指標篩選不嚴謹、誤將經濟類指標作為產齣指標等突齣問題。結論與建議:中國醫院效率DEA研究方法使用的閤理性、規範性有待進一步提高,研究與國際研究仍存在較大差距。建議相關研究者在醫院效率DEA研究方麵應追蹤國際最新研究,科學篩選投入產齣指標,深入分析使用方法和應用條件,提升中國醫院效率DEA研究的規範性和科學性。
목적:료해중국목전의원효솔수거포락분석( DEA)연구현상,위진일보제승중국의원효솔DEA연구수평제공삼고。방법:대1984-2014년응용수거포락분석중국의원효솔적85편밀절문헌진행계통분류화종술,총결귀납문헌적기본특점,대기투입산출지표진행귀류통계,병여국제동류문헌비교,평개중국차류연구적규범성。결과:응용DEA분석중국의원효솔적연구존재의원배치효솔연구문헌결핍、의원기술효솔모형단일、투입산출지표사선불엄근、오장경제류지표작위산출지표등돌출문제。결론여건의:중국의원효솔DEA연구방법사용적합이성、규범성유대진일보제고,연구여국제연구잉존재교대차거。건의상관연구자재의원효솔DEA연구방면응추종국제최신연구,과학사선투입산출지표,심입분석사용방법화응용조건,제승중국의원효솔DEA연구적규범성화과학성。
Objective:This study aims to explore recent developments in DEA-based hospital efficiency studies in China, so as to provide reference for further research in DEA-based hospital efficiency. Methods:In this study, a 30-year retrospective systematic review is conducted for the classification of 85 hospital efficiency studies that have been published in China with DEA. The characteristics are summarized and compared with those of international liter-ature according to the selection of input and output indicators to evaluate the normalization of studies in China. Re-sults:The classification reveals several problems existing in DEA-based hospital efficiency studies in China, such as too few studies on hospital allocation efficiency, the application of simple classical models, imprecise selection of in-put-output indicators, inappropriate application of monetary variables as output indicators, etc. Conclusions and sug-gestions:The normalization and rationality of DEA methods applied in China’s hospital efficiency research need to be improved, so as to shorten the gap between China and the international world. Chinese researchers should pay more attention to studying the latest international research findings, so as to scientifically select input and output indicators. In depth analysis of methods and application conditions should be conducted so as to improve the normalization and science of China’s hospital efficiency research.