实用医技杂志
實用醫技雜誌
실용의기잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL MEDICAL TECHNIQUES
2014年
10期
1043-1044
,共2页
胃肠道间质肿瘤%超声检查,多普勒%胃镜
胃腸道間質腫瘤%超聲檢查,多普勒%胃鏡
위장도간질종류%초성검사,다보륵%위경
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors%Ultrasonography,Doppler%Gastroscopes
目的分析多种影像学检查对胃肠道间叶源性肿瘤患者的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析经病理确诊的52例胃肠道间叶源性肿瘤患者，收集术前的胃窗超声造影、常规超声、胃镜、超声内镜、钡餐检查进行对比分析。结果胃窗超声造影检查、常规超声、胃镜、超声内镜、钡餐对胃肠道间叶源性肿瘤的检出率分别为95%、60%、95%、96%、67%，胃窗超声造影检查与常规超声比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），胃窗超声造影分别与胃镜、钡餐、超声内镜比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；胃镜与超声内镜、钡餐比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；钡餐分别与常规超声、超声内镜比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；超声内镜与常规超声比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论胃窗超声造影可作为胃肠道间叶源性肿瘤的一种普查方式进行推广应用。
目的分析多種影像學檢查對胃腸道間葉源性腫瘤患者的診斷價值。方法迴顧性分析經病理確診的52例胃腸道間葉源性腫瘤患者，收集術前的胃窗超聲造影、常規超聲、胃鏡、超聲內鏡、鋇餐檢查進行對比分析。結果胃窗超聲造影檢查、常規超聲、胃鏡、超聲內鏡、鋇餐對胃腸道間葉源性腫瘤的檢齣率分彆為95%、60%、95%、96%、67%，胃窗超聲造影檢查與常規超聲比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05），胃窗超聲造影分彆與胃鏡、鋇餐、超聲內鏡比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；胃鏡與超聲內鏡、鋇餐比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；鋇餐分彆與常規超聲、超聲內鏡比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；超聲內鏡與常規超聲比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論胃窗超聲造影可作為胃腸道間葉源性腫瘤的一種普查方式進行推廣應用。
목적분석다충영상학검사대위장도간협원성종류환자적진단개치。방법회고성분석경병리학진적52례위장도간협원성종류환자，수집술전적위창초성조영、상규초성、위경、초성내경、패찬검사진행대비분석。결과위창초성조영검사、상규초성、위경、초성내경、패찬대위장도간협원성종류적검출솔분별위95%、60%、95%、96%、67%，위창초성조영검사여상규초성비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），위창초성조영분별여위경、패찬、초성내경비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；위경여초성내경、패찬비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；패찬분별여상규초성、초성내경비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；초성내경여상규초성비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론위창초성조영가작위위장도간협원성종류적일충보사방식진행추엄응용。
Objective To analyze the diagnosis value of imaging examinations on gastric mesonchymal tumor pati-ents. Methods Fifty-two cases of gastric mesonchymal tumor patients confirmed by pathology were retrospectively anal-yzed. Collection of preoperative oral ultrasonic contrast agent ultrasound, conventional ultrasound, ultrasonic endoscopy, barium meal examination and gastroscopy and making a comparision on them. Results Oral ultrasonic contrast agent ultrasound, conventional ultrasound, gastroscope, ultrasonic endoscopy, barium meal examination detection rate were 95%, 60%, 95%, 96%, 67%. There was statistically significant difference between oral ultrasonic contrast agent ultrasound and conventional ultrasound (P<0.05); there was no statistical significance difference between oral ultrasonic contrast agent ultrasound and ultrasonic endoscopy or barium meal examination or gastroscopy respectively (P>0.05);there was no stati-stically significant difference between gastroscopy and ultrasonic endoscopy or barium meal examination respectively (P>0.05); there was no statistically significant difference between barium meal examination and conventional ultrasound or ultrasonic endoscopy respectively (P>0.05);there was statistically significant differences between ultrasonic endoscopy and conventional ultrasound (P<0.05). Conclusion Oral ultrasonic contrast agent ultrasound imaging can be used as a window between gastric mesonchymal tumors of popularization and application in the form of a census.
