临床肿瘤学杂志
臨床腫瘤學雜誌
림상종류학잡지
CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2014年
10期
917-920
,共4页
吴标%郭增清%王丽莉%陈淑萍%叶韵斌%黄诚
吳標%郭增清%王麗莉%陳淑萍%葉韻斌%黃誠
오표%곽증청%왕려리%진숙평%협운빈%황성
树突状细胞%细胞因子诱导杀伤细胞%维持治疗%非小细胞肺癌
樹突狀細胞%細胞因子誘導殺傷細胞%維持治療%非小細胞肺癌
수돌상세포%세포인자유도살상세포%유지치료%비소세포폐암
Dendritic cells%Cytokine-induced killer cells%Maintenance therapy%Non-small cell lung cancer( NSCLC)
目的:评价树突状细胞联合自体细胞因子诱导杀伤细胞( DC/CIK)维持治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌( NSCLC)的疗效和不良反应。方法根据治疗情况将2010年1月至2014年1月120例含铂方案化疗4~6个周期后疾病稳定的晚期NSCLC患者分为对照组( n=65)和研究组( n=55),仅研究组化疗后接受DC/CIK维持治疗。对两组进行生存随访并比较中位无进展生存期( PFS)和总生存期( OS),同时记录不良反应情况。结果研究组的中位PFS为5.0个月,高于对照组的3.5个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组的中位OS为8.5个月,与对照组(8.0个月)的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组化疗后获不同疗效亚组中位PFS和OS的差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。常见不良反应为骨髓抑制、发热、乏力和关节酸痛,两组不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论 DC/CIK维持治疗可延长化疗后疾病稳定晚期NSCLC患者的进展时间,且不良反应轻,患者可耐受。
目的:評價樹突狀細胞聯閤自體細胞因子誘導殺傷細胞( DC/CIK)維持治療晚期非小細胞肺癌( NSCLC)的療效和不良反應。方法根據治療情況將2010年1月至2014年1月120例含鉑方案化療4~6箇週期後疾病穩定的晚期NSCLC患者分為對照組( n=65)和研究組( n=55),僅研究組化療後接受DC/CIK維持治療。對兩組進行生存隨訪併比較中位無進展生存期( PFS)和總生存期( OS),同時記錄不良反應情況。結果研究組的中位PFS為5.0箇月,高于對照組的3.5箇月,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);研究組的中位OS為8.5箇月,與對照組(8.0箇月)的差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);兩組化療後穫不同療效亞組中位PFS和OS的差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05)。常見不良反應為骨髓抑製、髮熱、乏力和關節痠痛,兩組不良反應髮生率的差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論 DC/CIK維持治療可延長化療後疾病穩定晚期NSCLC患者的進展時間,且不良反應輕,患者可耐受。
목적:평개수돌상세포연합자체세포인자유도살상세포( DC/CIK)유지치료만기비소세포폐암( NSCLC)적료효화불량반응。방법근거치료정황장2010년1월지2014년1월120례함박방안화료4~6개주기후질병은정적만기NSCLC환자분위대조조( n=65)화연구조( n=55),부연구조화료후접수DC/CIK유지치료。대량조진행생존수방병비교중위무진전생존기( PFS)화총생존기( OS),동시기록불량반응정황。결과연구조적중위PFS위5.0개월,고우대조조적3.5개월,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);연구조적중위OS위8.5개월,여대조조(8.0개월)적차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);량조화료후획불동료효아조중위PFS화OS적차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05)。상견불량반응위골수억제、발열、핍력화관절산통,량조불량반응발생솔적차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론 DC/CIK유지치료가연장화료후질병은정만기NSCLC환자적진전시간,차불량반응경,환자가내수。
Objective To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of dendritic cells/cytokine-induced killer cells ( DC/CIK) as the maintenance therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) . Methods During January 2010 and January 2014, 120 ad-vanced NSCLC patients in stable condition were enrolled after 4-6 cycles chemotherapy containing platinum. According to the treatment, patients were assigned into control group ( n=65) and study group ( n=55) . Only the study group received DC/CIK maintenance ther-apy. Both groups were followed up and the progression free survival ( PFS) and overall survival ( OS) were compared. Moreover, the adverse reaction was recorded. Results The median PFS and OS were 5. 0 and 8. 5 months in study group and 3. 5 and 8. 0 months in control group, respectively. The median PFS was higher in study group versus control group ( P<0. 05) . No significant differences were observed on median OS between both groups. In addition, there were similar median PFS and OS between different chemotherapeutic efficacy of sub-group. The common adverse reaction included myelosuppression, fever, fatigue and joint pain. The differences of both groups were not statistically significant ( P>0. 05) . Conclusion DC/CIK as the maintenance therapy can prolong the progression of advanced NSCLC patients in stable condition with tolerable and low adverse reaction.