华东经济管理
華東經濟管理
화동경제관리
EAST CHINA ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT
2014年
11期
53-58
,共6页
居民收入差距%空间面板模型%城镇化%产业结构调整
居民收入差距%空間麵闆模型%城鎮化%產業結構調整
거민수입차거%공간면판모형%성진화%산업결구조정
income inequity of residents%spatial panel model%urbanization%industrial structure adjustment
文章利用空间面板模型研究我国省际居民收入差距及其影响因素的贡献性。根据2005-2012年的相关经济数据，分析31个省市自治区的居民人均收入的空间相关性，发现各地区居民收入有很强的空间依赖效应，高-高聚集地区和低-低聚集地区占比达到了80.6%。建立空间面板数据模型，发现经济增长水平、产业结构调整水平、城镇化水平和相邻地区的居民收入水平对我国省际居民收入差距有重要影响。其中经济增长水平差距对居民收入差距的影响度最高，达到40.31%，城镇化水平和相邻地区的居民收入水平的影响度也较高，分别达到11.56%和21.86%，而产业结构调整水平对收入差距的影响度较低。
文章利用空間麵闆模型研究我國省際居民收入差距及其影響因素的貢獻性。根據2005-2012年的相關經濟數據，分析31箇省市自治區的居民人均收入的空間相關性，髮現各地區居民收入有很彊的空間依賴效應，高-高聚集地區和低-低聚集地區佔比達到瞭80.6%。建立空間麵闆數據模型，髮現經濟增長水平、產業結構調整水平、城鎮化水平和相鄰地區的居民收入水平對我國省際居民收入差距有重要影響。其中經濟增長水平差距對居民收入差距的影響度最高，達到40.31%，城鎮化水平和相鄰地區的居民收入水平的影響度也較高，分彆達到11.56%和21.86%，而產業結構調整水平對收入差距的影響度較低。
문장이용공간면판모형연구아국성제거민수입차거급기영향인소적공헌성。근거2005-2012년적상관경제수거，분석31개성시자치구적거민인균수입적공간상관성，발현각지구거민수입유흔강적공간의뢰효응，고-고취집지구화저-저취집지구점비체도료80.6%。건립공간면판수거모형，발현경제증장수평、산업결구조정수평、성진화수평화상린지구적거민수입수평대아국성제거민수입차거유중요영향。기중경제증장수평차거대거민수입차거적영향도최고，체도40.31%，성진화수평화상린지구적거민수입수평적영향도야교고，분별체도11.56%화21.86%，이산업결구조정수평대수입차거적영향도교저。
The paper makes a study on the provincial income inequity of residents and its influencing factors in China by apply-ing the spatial panel model. It also carries out an analysis on the spatial correlation of the per capita income of residents in 31 provinces,autonomous regions and municipalities based on the relevant economic data from the year of 2005 to 2012. The re-sults show that the income of residents in each area has a strong spatial dependence effect,and both high-high and low-low ag-glomeration areas account to 80.6%. The study also finds that the levels of economic growth, industrial structure adjustment, urbanization and income of residents of the adjacent areas have important effects on the provincial income inequity by building the spatial panel model. Among them, the most important factor is the level of local economy whose contribution is 40.31%, the levels of urbanization and income of residents of the adjacent areas reach 11.56%and 21.86%respectively. However, the impact of the level of industrial structure adjustment is relatively lower.
