浙江医学教育
浙江醫學教育
절강의학교육
Zhejiang Medical Education
2014年
5期
60-62
,共3页
拉玛泽镇痛分娩法%导乐分娩法
拉瑪澤鎮痛分娩法%導樂分娩法
랍마택진통분면법%도악분면법
lamaze analgesia laboring method%doula delivery method
目的：分析拉玛泽镇痛分娩法在分娩过程中的镇痛效果和护理体会。方法：将640例要求阴道分娩的初产妇随机分为实验组320例（拉玛泽镇痛分娩法）和对照组320例（导乐分娩法），比较2组产妇分娩过程疼痛程度、产程时间、分娩方式、药物使用率。结果：实验组疼痛程度、产程时间、阴道分娩率、药物使用率与对照组比较，差异均有统计学意义（ P＜0.05）。结论：非药物性拉玛泽镇痛分娩法较导乐分娩法减轻产妇分娩痛的程度，缩短产妇产程，提高阴道分娩率及降低药物的使用率，值得基层医院推广应用。
目的：分析拉瑪澤鎮痛分娩法在分娩過程中的鎮痛效果和護理體會。方法：將640例要求陰道分娩的初產婦隨機分為實驗組320例（拉瑪澤鎮痛分娩法）和對照組320例（導樂分娩法），比較2組產婦分娩過程疼痛程度、產程時間、分娩方式、藥物使用率。結果：實驗組疼痛程度、產程時間、陰道分娩率、藥物使用率與對照組比較，差異均有統計學意義（ P＜0.05）。結論：非藥物性拉瑪澤鎮痛分娩法較導樂分娩法減輕產婦分娩痛的程度，縮短產婦產程，提高陰道分娩率及降低藥物的使用率，值得基層醫院推廣應用。
목적：분석랍마택진통분면법재분면과정중적진통효과화호리체회。방법：장640례요구음도분면적초산부수궤분위실험조320례（랍마택진통분면법）화대조조320례（도악분면법），비교2조산부분면과정동통정도、산정시간、분면방식、약물사용솔。결과：실험조동통정도、산정시간、음도분면솔、약물사용솔여대조조비교，차이균유통계학의의（ P＜0.05）。결론：비약물성랍마택진통분면법교도악분면법감경산부분면통적정도，축단산부산정，제고음도분면솔급강저약물적사용솔，치득기층의원추엄응용。
Objective ] To analysis the clinical effects of Lamaze analgesia laboring method and the nursing experience . [Method]640 cases of primiparas intending to take spontaneous delivery were randomly divided into two groups ,the experiment group (n =320 ,Lamaze delivery method ) and the control group (n =320 ,Doula delivery method ) .The pain degree ,deliv-ery duration ,delivery method and the rate of drug usage of the two groupswere compared .[Result]Significant statistical differ-ence was found between the experiment group and control group in the pain degree ,the spontaneous delivery ,the total delivery duration and the drug usage ( P<0 .05 ) .[Conclusion]Non-drug Lamaze delivery method can relieve the delivery pain ,short-en the delivery course , raise rate of spontaneous delivery and reduce the rate of drug usage compared with Doula delivery method ,thus the method was worthy of clinical generalization and application in grassroots hospitals .
