云南中医学院学报
雲南中醫學院學報
운남중의학원학보
JOURNAL OF YUNNAN COLLEGE OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
5期
61-65,67
,共6页
李进进%邵晓梅%赵文胜%商越%方剑乔
李進進%邵曉梅%趙文勝%商越%方劍喬
리진진%소효매%조문성%상월%방검교
针灸%全身麻醉%随机对照试验%系统评价%Meta分析
針灸%全身痳醉%隨機對照試驗%繫統評價%Meta分析
침구%전신마취%수궤대조시험%계통평개%Meta분석
acupuncture%general anesthesia%randomized controlled trials%systematic review%meta-analysis
目的:系统评价针灸复合麻醉对术中麻醉药使用量、苏醒时间、心率和平均动脉压的干预效应。方法由2人按制定的检索策略独立对7个电子数据库进行文献检索,以临床研究为单位,辅以手工检索相关文献;按研究纳入和排除标准筛选符合要求针灸辅助麻醉临床试验;根据Cochrane Handbook指导2人独立使用RevMan对每个符合纳入标准的临床试验进行偏倚风险和文献质量评估,并提取纳入研究的对象、方法和结果等资料;选取术中维持一定麻醉深度所使用的麻醉药品总量作为主要指标,术中心率和平均动脉压及术后苏醒时间为次要指标,条件符合时采取Meta分析。结果最终纳入12项研究,包括979名患者,静脉麻醉药丙泊酚用量均数差值(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)为-59.29[-91.92,-26.67];吸入麻醉药用量标准化均数差值(SMD)和95% CI为-2.34[-3.60,-1.09];苏醒时间MD和95% CI为-4.31[-4.52,-4.10];全麻过程中各时间点心率和平均动脉压95% CI均跨越无效线。结论针灸复合全身麻醉与常规全身麻醉相比,能减少麻醉药品使用量和缩短麻醉苏醒时间,对心率和平均动脉压无明显影响。
目的:繫統評價針灸複閤痳醉對術中痳醉藥使用量、囌醒時間、心率和平均動脈壓的榦預效應。方法由2人按製定的檢索策略獨立對7箇電子數據庫進行文獻檢索,以臨床研究為單位,輔以手工檢索相關文獻;按研究納入和排除標準篩選符閤要求針灸輔助痳醉臨床試驗;根據Cochrane Handbook指導2人獨立使用RevMan對每箇符閤納入標準的臨床試驗進行偏倚風險和文獻質量評估,併提取納入研究的對象、方法和結果等資料;選取術中維持一定痳醉深度所使用的痳醉藥品總量作為主要指標,術中心率和平均動脈壓及術後囌醒時間為次要指標,條件符閤時採取Meta分析。結果最終納入12項研究,包括979名患者,靜脈痳醉藥丙泊酚用量均數差值(MD)和95%置信區間(CI)為-59.29[-91.92,-26.67];吸入痳醉藥用量標準化均數差值(SMD)和95% CI為-2.34[-3.60,-1.09];囌醒時間MD和95% CI為-4.31[-4.52,-4.10];全痳過程中各時間點心率和平均動脈壓95% CI均跨越無效線。結論針灸複閤全身痳醉與常規全身痳醉相比,能減少痳醉藥品使用量和縮短痳醉囌醒時間,對心率和平均動脈壓無明顯影響。
목적:계통평개침구복합마취대술중마취약사용량、소성시간、심솔화평균동맥압적간예효응。방법유2인안제정적검색책략독립대7개전자수거고진행문헌검색,이림상연구위단위,보이수공검색상관문헌;안연구납입화배제표준사선부합요구침구보조마취림상시험;근거Cochrane Handbook지도2인독립사용RevMan대매개부합납입표준적림상시험진행편의풍험화문헌질량평고,병제취납입연구적대상、방법화결과등자료;선취술중유지일정마취심도소사용적마취약품총량작위주요지표,술중심솔화평균동맥압급술후소성시간위차요지표,조건부합시채취Meta분석。결과최종납입12항연구,포괄979명환자,정맥마취약병박분용량균수차치(MD)화95%치신구간(CI)위-59.29[-91.92,-26.67];흡입마취약용량표준화균수차치(SMD)화95% CI위-2.34[-3.60,-1.09];소성시간MD화95% CI위-4.31[-4.52,-4.10];전마과정중각시간점심솔화평균동맥압95% CI균과월무효선。결론침구복합전신마취여상규전신마취상비,능감소마취약품사용량화축단마취소성시간,대심솔화평균동맥압무명현영향。
Objective This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture combined general anesthesia. Methods Systematic literature searches of 7 electronic databases were performed from inception to December 2013 by two investigators. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of acupuncture compared with a control(routine procedure) or a sham intervention in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Two reviewers selected eligible studies and evaluated the risk of bias and the quality of the acupuncture intervention. Information on methods, participants, interventions, and outcomes was extracted. The total consumption of anesthetics during surgery was selected as the primary index. Meta-analysis of heart rate, mean arterial pressure and anesthetic recovery time was performed using random or fixed effects modeling. Results Twelve trials that included 979 patients who received general anesthesia met the inclusion criteria. Results of pooled analyses indicated that compared with general anesthesia alone, acupuncture assistance significantly reduced the total dose of anesthetics needed (mean difference [95%CI], propofol (mg),-59. 29 [-91. 92, -26. 67], inhalational anesthetic (MAC)-2. 34 [-3. 60, -1. 09] and the anesthetic recovery time (min)-4. 31 [-4. 52, -4. 10], while no significant difference on heart rate and mean arterial pressure. Conclusion Compared with routine general anesthesia alone, acupuncture assistance reduces the dose of anesthetics and shortens anesthetic recovery time, shows no effect on heart rate and mean arterial pressure.