中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2014年
31期
3720-3723
,共4页
钟思干%杨飞%陈爱文%刘凌%廖火城%肖纯%姚筱
鐘思榦%楊飛%陳愛文%劉凌%廖火城%肖純%姚篠
종사간%양비%진애문%류릉%료화성%초순%요소
前列地尔%糖尿病%冠心病%介入治疗%造影剂肾病
前列地爾%糖尿病%冠心病%介入治療%造影劑腎病
전렬지이%당뇨병%관심병%개입치료%조영제신병
Alprostadil%Diabetes mellitus%Coronary artery disease%Interventional therapy%Contrast nephropathy
目的:探讨前列地尔对合并糖尿病的冠心病患者介入治疗中造影剂肾病的预防作用。方法选取我院2012年1月-2013年7月收治的冠心病合并糖尿病且拟行介入治疗的患者100例,采用单纯随机分组方法分为观察组50例与对照组50例。对照组患者使用水化疗法预防造影剂肾病,观察组患者增加使用前列地尔,比较两组患者的造影剂肾病发生率,造影前后肾功能、血管内皮功能的变化以及预后情况。结果(1)观察组和对照组分别有1例和8例患者发生造影剂肾病,发生率分别为2.00%和16.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。(2)造影前,两组患者血尿素氮、尿β2微球蛋白、血清肌酐水平间差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05);造影后72 h 时,观察组患者血尿素氮和尿β2微球蛋白水平与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);造影后72 h,两组患者血尿素和尿β2微球蛋白水平与造影前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);造影后72 h 后,对照组患者的血清肌酐水平与造影前比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。(3)造影前,两组患者一氧化氮、一氧化氮合成酶和内皮素1水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);造影后72 h,观察组患者一氧化氮、一氧化氮合成酶和内皮素1水平与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);造影后72 h,两组患者一氧化氮、一氧化氮合成酶和内皮素1水平与造影前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。(4)对照组预后不良共13例(26.0%),观察组预后不良共4例(8.0%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论前列地尔在合并有糖尿病的冠心病介入治疗患者中起到良好的预防造影剂肾病的作用,其可保护患者肾功能和血管内皮功能,改善患者预后。
目的:探討前列地爾對閤併糖尿病的冠心病患者介入治療中造影劑腎病的預防作用。方法選取我院2012年1月-2013年7月收治的冠心病閤併糖尿病且擬行介入治療的患者100例,採用單純隨機分組方法分為觀察組50例與對照組50例。對照組患者使用水化療法預防造影劑腎病,觀察組患者增加使用前列地爾,比較兩組患者的造影劑腎病髮生率,造影前後腎功能、血管內皮功能的變化以及預後情況。結果(1)觀察組和對照組分彆有1例和8例患者髮生造影劑腎病,髮生率分彆為2.00%和16.00%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。(2)造影前,兩組患者血尿素氮、尿β2微毬蛋白、血清肌酐水平間差異均無統計學意義(P >0.05);造影後72 h 時,觀察組患者血尿素氮和尿β2微毬蛋白水平與對照組比較,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05);造影後72 h,兩組患者血尿素和尿β2微毬蛋白水平與造影前比較,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05);造影後72 h 後,對照組患者的血清肌酐水平與造影前比較,差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。(3)造影前,兩組患者一氧化氮、一氧化氮閤成酶和內皮素1水平比較,差異無統計學意義(P >0.05);造影後72 h,觀察組患者一氧化氮、一氧化氮閤成酶和內皮素1水平與對照組比較,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05);造影後72 h,兩組患者一氧化氮、一氧化氮閤成酶和內皮素1水平與造影前比較,差異均有統計學意義(P <0.05)。(4)對照組預後不良共13例(26.0%),觀察組預後不良共4例(8.0%),兩組間差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論前列地爾在閤併有糖尿病的冠心病介入治療患者中起到良好的預防造影劑腎病的作用,其可保護患者腎功能和血管內皮功能,改善患者預後。
목적:탐토전렬지이대합병당뇨병적관심병환자개입치료중조영제신병적예방작용。방법선취아원2012년1월-2013년7월수치적관심병합병당뇨병차의행개입치료적환자100례,채용단순수궤분조방법분위관찰조50례여대조조50례。대조조환자사용수화요법예방조영제신병,관찰조환자증가사용전렬지이,비교량조환자적조영제신병발생솔,조영전후신공능、혈관내피공능적변화이급예후정황。결과(1)관찰조화대조조분별유1례화8례환자발생조영제신병,발생솔분별위2.00%화16.00%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。(2)조영전,량조환자혈뇨소담、뇨β2미구단백、혈청기항수평간차이균무통계학의의(P >0.05);조영후72 h 시,관찰조환자혈뇨소담화뇨β2미구단백수평여대조조비교,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05);조영후72 h,량조환자혈뇨소화뇨β2미구단백수평여조영전비교,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05);조영후72 h 후,대조조환자적혈청기항수평여조영전비교,차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。(3)조영전,량조환자일양화담、일양화담합성매화내피소1수평비교,차이무통계학의의(P >0.05);조영후72 h,관찰조환자일양화담、일양화담합성매화내피소1수평여대조조비교,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05);조영후72 h,량조환자일양화담、일양화담합성매화내피소1수평여조영전비교,차이균유통계학의의(P <0.05)。(4)대조조예후불량공13례(26.0%),관찰조예후불량공4례(8.0%),량조간차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론전렬지이재합병유당뇨병적관심병개입치료환자중기도량호적예방조영제신병적작용,기가보호환자신공능화혈관내피공능,개선환자예후。
Objective To explore the preventive effect of alprostadil in the interventional therapy on contrast nephrop-athy among the patients with coronary artery disease complicated with diabetes. Methods 100 patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease who were admitted in our hospital from January,2012 to July,2013 and scheduled for interventional therapy were randomly divided into observe group(50),receiving additional alprostadil and the control group(50),receiving hydration therapy. The incidence of contrast nephropathy rate,change of vascular endothelium and renal function before and after angiogra-phy,and prognosis between the two groups were compared. Results (1)one case in observe group and eight cases in control group suffered contrast nephropathy and the incidence was 2. 00% and16. 00% respectively,with significant difference( P <0. 05);(2)Before angiography,no significant difference of blood urea,Urine β2 - microglobulin and serum creatinine between the two groups was found;72h after angiography,the difference of blood urea and Urineβ2 - microglobulin was significant be-tween the two groups and from that before angiography(P < 0. 05);the difference of serum creatinine in control group was signif-icant compared with that before angiography(P < 0. 05). (3)The difference of nitric oxide,nitric oxide synthase and endothe-lin 1 between the two groups was not significant(P > 0. 05);72h after angiography,the difference was significant between the two groups and compared with that after angiography( P < 0. 05). (4)13(26. 0% ) and in control 4(8. 0% ) had poor prognosis,with significant difference(P < 0. 05). Conclusion Alprostadil in the interventional therapy can have a satisfactory effect on the prevention of contrast nephropathy among the patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease and on the protection of vascular endothelium and renal function,with a higher prognostic level.