中国全科医学
中國全科醫學
중국전과의학
CHINESE GENERAL PRACTICE
2014年
31期
3696-3698,3712
,共4页
孙玫%冯辉%李华艳%Jeffrey Fuller%徐霜%崔虹艳%王秀华%唐四元
孫玫%馮輝%李華豔%Jeffrey Fuller%徐霜%崔虹豔%王秀華%唐四元
손매%풍휘%리화염%Jeffrey Fuller%서상%최홍염%왕수화%당사원
慢性病保健评估问卷%汉化%信度%效度%评价
慢性病保健評估問捲%漢化%信度%效度%評價
만성병보건평고문권%한화%신도%효도%평개
Assessment of chronic illness care%Chinese translation%Reliability%Validity%Evaluation
目的:翻译、跨文化修订形成机构版慢性病保健评估问卷( assessment of chronic illness care,ACIC)简体中文版,并评价其信效度。方法引进 ACIC,进行翻译、回译及文化调试,最终修订为包含七个维度,34个条目的 ACIC 简体中文版。并于2013年11月-2014年2月,采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样法在湖南省抽取102家基层医疗卫生机构的400名医务人员进行问卷调查,对问卷进行内部一致性、重测信度、内容效度、因子分析等信效度分析。结果 ACIC 简体中文版可行性良好(得到有效问卷390份,有效回收率为89.0%)。问卷的 Cronbach's α系数为0.826,问卷各维度的 Cronbach's α系数为0.880~0.930;重测信度为0.722(P <0.01);七因子结构方程模型拟合良好,χ2/ df 为2.70,RMSEA 为0.066。结论 ACIC 简体中文版有较好的信度、效度,可作为特异性 ACIC,用于评价医疗机构慢性病保健服务能力及水平。
目的:翻譯、跨文化脩訂形成機構版慢性病保健評估問捲( assessment of chronic illness care,ACIC)簡體中文版,併評價其信效度。方法引進 ACIC,進行翻譯、迴譯及文化調試,最終脩訂為包含七箇維度,34箇條目的 ACIC 簡體中文版。併于2013年11月-2014年2月,採用多階段分層整群隨機抽樣法在湖南省抽取102傢基層醫療衛生機構的400名醫務人員進行問捲調查,對問捲進行內部一緻性、重測信度、內容效度、因子分析等信效度分析。結果 ACIC 簡體中文版可行性良好(得到有效問捲390份,有效迴收率為89.0%)。問捲的 Cronbach's α繫數為0.826,問捲各維度的 Cronbach's α繫數為0.880~0.930;重測信度為0.722(P <0.01);七因子結構方程模型擬閤良好,χ2/ df 為2.70,RMSEA 為0.066。結論 ACIC 簡體中文版有較好的信度、效度,可作為特異性 ACIC,用于評價醫療機構慢性病保健服務能力及水平。
목적:번역、과문화수정형성궤구판만성병보건평고문권( assessment of chronic illness care,ACIC)간체중문판,병평개기신효도。방법인진 ACIC,진행번역、회역급문화조시,최종수정위포함칠개유도,34개조목적 ACIC 간체중문판。병우2013년11월-2014년2월,채용다계단분층정군수궤추양법재호남성추취102가기층의료위생궤구적400명의무인원진행문권조사,대문권진행내부일치성、중측신도、내용효도、인자분석등신효도분석。결과 ACIC 간체중문판가행성량호(득도유효문권390빈,유효회수솔위89.0%)。문권적 Cronbach's α계수위0.826,문권각유도적 Cronbach's α계수위0.880~0.930;중측신도위0.722(P <0.01);칠인자결구방정모형의합량호,χ2/ df 위2.70,RMSEA 위0.066。결론 ACIC 간체중문판유교호적신도、효도,가작위특이성 ACIC,용우평개의료궤구만성병보건복무능력급수평。
Objective To design the simplified Chinese version of Assessment of Chronic Illness Care( ACIC)in mechanism edition by translation and cross - cultural revision and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods We introduced ACIC from abroad and revised it into simplified Chinese edition including 7 dimensions and 34 items by translation,back transla-tion and culture adjustment. Using multi - stage stratified cluster random sampling method,from Nov,2013 to Feb,2014,400 personnel selected from 102 community health service institutions in Hunan province were investigated with questionnaire about the internal consistency,the test - retest reliability,content validity and factor analysis. Results The simplified Chinese version of ACIC had good feasibility(returned valid questionnaires were 390 and the valid recovery rate was 89. 0% ). The Cronbach's αcoefficients was 0. 826 and that of all factors of ACIC ranged from 0. 880 to 0. 930. Test - retest reliability coefficients was 0. 722 (P < 0. 01). Structural equation model showed good fit,χ2 / df being 2. 70 and RMSEA 0. 066. Conclusion The Chinese ver-sion of ACIC has good reliability and validity,which can be used as a kind of specific ACIC to evaluate medical institutions' serv-ice ability and level in treating chronic diseases.