北京口腔医学
北京口腔醫學
북경구강의학
BEIJING JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2014年
5期
272-275
,共4页
胡坤娥%谭荣%刘志强%王左敏
鬍坤娥%譚榮%劉誌彊%王左敏
호곤아%담영%류지강%왕좌민
慢性牙周炎%慢性阻塞性肺疾病%牙周干预
慢性牙週炎%慢性阻塞性肺疾病%牙週榦預
만성아주염%만성조새성폐질병%아주간예
Chronic periodontal disease%Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease%Periodontal intervention
目的:比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴慢性牙周炎患者在进行牙周干预治疗前、后,多因素分级系统BODE指数分级人数分布的变化,探讨牙周干预疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病预后的改善作用。方法选择87名中、重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴牙周炎患者,分为干预组43例,对照组44例;干预组进行牙周干预治疗,对照组仅进行口腔卫生宣教;2组分别记录基线及受试1年后出血指数、牙周附着丧失及BODE指数分级情况。结果干预组牙周治疗后出血指数、牙周附着丧失与基线及对照组比差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预组牙周干预治疗后BODE分级人数分布与治疗前及对照组比差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论牙周干预治疗可促进患者的口腔卫生及牙周健康状况,可改善中、重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴牙周炎患者的预后,牙周干预治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病具有积极作用。
目的:比較慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴慢性牙週炎患者在進行牙週榦預治療前、後,多因素分級繫統BODE指數分級人數分佈的變化,探討牙週榦預療對慢性阻塞性肺疾病預後的改善作用。方法選擇87名中、重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴牙週炎患者,分為榦預組43例,對照組44例;榦預組進行牙週榦預治療,對照組僅進行口腔衛生宣教;2組分彆記錄基線及受試1年後齣血指數、牙週附著喪失及BODE指數分級情況。結果榦預組牙週治療後齣血指數、牙週附著喪失與基線及對照組比差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05)。榦預組牙週榦預治療後BODE分級人數分佈與治療前及對照組比差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.05)。結論牙週榦預治療可促進患者的口腔衛生及牙週健康狀況,可改善中、重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴牙週炎患者的預後,牙週榦預治療對慢性阻塞性肺疾病具有積極作用。
목적:비교만성조새성폐질병반만성아주염환자재진행아주간예치료전、후,다인소분급계통BODE지수분급인수분포적변화,탐토아주간예료대만성조새성폐질병예후적개선작용。방법선택87명중、중도만성조새성폐질병반아주염환자,분위간예조43례,대조조44례;간예조진행아주간예치료,대조조부진행구강위생선교;2조분별기록기선급수시1년후출혈지수、아주부착상실급BODE지수분급정황。결과간예조아주치료후출혈지수、아주부착상실여기선급대조조비차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05)。간예조아주간예치료후BODE분급인수분포여치료전급대조조비차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.05)。결론아주간예치료가촉진환자적구강위생급아주건강상황,가개선중、중도만성조새성폐질병반아주염환자적예후,아주간예치료대만성조새성폐질병구유적겁작용。
Objective To investigate the effect of periodontal intervention on the prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods Eighty-seven patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) and chronic periodontal disease were included in this study. Forty-three patients received periodontal intervention and 44 served as control. Bleeding index( BI ), attachment loss(AL) and BODE indexes of two groups were measured and recorded at baseline and one year after periodontal intervention respectively. Results After periodontal intervention, the BI(2. 13 ± 1. 49)and AL(3. 01 ± 0. 55) of the intervention group were significantly different from those(BI:3. 58 ± 0. 77,AL:4. 58 ± 0. 46) of the control(P<0. 05). There was also significant difference in BODE indexes between the intervention group and the control ( P <0. 05 ) . Conclusion Periodontal intervention has a positive effect on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.