局解手术学杂志
跼解手術學雜誌
국해수술학잡지
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY
2014年
5期
534-536
,共3页
人工股骨头置换%老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折%动力髋螺钉内固定
人工股骨頭置換%老年不穩定股骨粗隆間骨摺%動力髖螺釘內固定
인공고골두치환%노년불은정고골조륭간골절%동력관라정내고정
artificial femoral head replacement%elderly unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture%dynamic hip screw internal fixation
目的:探讨双极人工股骨头置换治疗老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法将82例老年不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折患者随机分为2组,每组41例,对照组采用动力髋螺钉内固定术治疗,观察组采用双极人工股骨头置换术治疗,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量及下地活动时间,患者出院后随访1年,比较术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月时2组髋关节Harris评分,记录并比较患者并发症发生情况。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量及下地活动时间均小于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组术后1个月、3个月 Harris 评分差异有统计学意义,观察组优于对照组,术后6月、12月差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论双极股骨头置换术操作简单、创伤小、并发症少,有利于患者早期下床活动和髋关节功能的恢复,适合老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗。
目的:探討雙極人工股骨頭置換治療老年不穩定股骨粗隆間骨摺的臨床療效。方法將82例老年不穩定股骨粗隆間骨摺患者隨機分為2組,每組41例,對照組採用動力髖螺釘內固定術治療,觀察組採用雙極人工股骨頭置換術治療,比較2組手術時間、術中齣血量及下地活動時間,患者齣院後隨訪1年,比較術後1箇月、3箇月、6箇月、12箇月時2組髖關節Harris評分,記錄併比較患者併髮癥髮生情況。結果觀察組手術時間、術中齣血量及下地活動時間均小于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);2組術後1箇月、3箇月 Harris 評分差異有統計學意義,觀察組優于對照組,術後6月、12月差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);觀察組併髮癥髮生率低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論雙極股骨頭置換術操作簡單、創傷小、併髮癥少,有利于患者早期下床活動和髖關節功能的恢複,適閤老年不穩定型股骨粗隆間骨摺的治療。
목적:탐토쌍겁인공고골두치환치료노년불은정고골조륭간골절적림상료효。방법장82례노년불은정고골조륭간골절환자수궤분위2조,매조41례,대조조채용동력관라정내고정술치료,관찰조채용쌍겁인공고골두치환술치료,비교2조수술시간、술중출혈량급하지활동시간,환자출원후수방1년,비교술후1개월、3개월、6개월、12개월시2조관관절Harris평분,기록병비교환자병발증발생정황。결과관찰조수술시간、술중출혈량급하지활동시간균소우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);2조술후1개월、3개월 Harris 평분차이유통계학의의,관찰조우우대조조,술후6월、12월차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);관찰조병발증발생솔저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론쌍겁고골두치환술조작간단、창상소、병발증소,유리우환자조기하상활동화관관절공능적회복,괄합노년불은정형고골조륭간골절적치료。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of bipolar artificial femoral head replacement in the treatment of elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Methods 82 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were randomly divided into two groups with 41 cases in each group. The control group was treated with dynamic hip screw internal fixation, and the observation group was treated with bipolar artificial femoral head replacement. The operation time, bleeding volume and ambulation time were compared, and all the patients were followed up for one year. Harris scores of the two groups at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation were compared, and the incidence of complications were recorded and compared. Results The operation time, bleeding volume and ambu-lation time of the observation group were less than the control group with a statistically significant difference (P<0. 05);Harris scores of the 2 groups at 1 month and 3 months after operation were of significant difference, while there was no significant difference at 6 months, and 12 months after operation (P>0. 05). The incidence of complication of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0. 05). Conclusion Bipolar femoral head replacement has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma and complications. It is conducive to the early ambulation of patients and the recovery of hip function, and it is suitable for elder-ly patients with unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture.