临床医学工程
臨床醫學工程
림상의학공정
CLINICAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING
2014年
10期
1356-1358
,共3页
家属%个性化干预%轻度认知功能损害%静脉输液安全
傢屬%箇性化榦預%輕度認知功能損害%靜脈輸液安全
가속%개성화간예%경도인지공능손해%정맥수액안전
Family%Personalized intervention%Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)%Security of intravenous infusions
目的:探讨家属参与个性化护理干预对轻度认知功能损害患者静脉输液安全的影响。方法将2013年9月至12月在中心注射室进行静脉输液治疗的M悦陨患者39例为对照组,2014年1月至4月的M悦陨患者40例为观察组,对两组患者进行相同内容的护理干预,观察组患者家属参与护理干预的全过程。1个月后,比较两两组患者的蒙特利尔认知评估量表(M燥悦A)各认知域得分及总分、输液安全问题发生率及对输液过程满意度。结果干预后观察组M燥悦A各认知域得分及总分、输液安全问题发生率及对输液过程满意度均优于对照组,比较差异有统计学意义(孕<0.05)。结论家属参与个性化护理干预不仅能改善M悦陨患者的认知功能,而且能有效减少患者输液安全问题的发生率,提高其对输液过程的满意度。
目的:探討傢屬參與箇性化護理榦預對輕度認知功能損害患者靜脈輸液安全的影響。方法將2013年9月至12月在中心註射室進行靜脈輸液治療的M悅隕患者39例為對照組,2014年1月至4月的M悅隕患者40例為觀察組,對兩組患者進行相同內容的護理榦預,觀察組患者傢屬參與護理榦預的全過程。1箇月後,比較兩兩組患者的矇特利爾認知評估量錶(M燥悅A)各認知域得分及總分、輸液安全問題髮生率及對輸液過程滿意度。結果榦預後觀察組M燥悅A各認知域得分及總分、輸液安全問題髮生率及對輸液過程滿意度均優于對照組,比較差異有統計學意義(孕<0.05)。結論傢屬參與箇性化護理榦預不僅能改善M悅隕患者的認知功能,而且能有效減少患者輸液安全問題的髮生率,提高其對輸液過程的滿意度。
목적:탐토가속삼여개성화호리간예대경도인지공능손해환자정맥수액안전적영향。방법장2013년9월지12월재중심주사실진행정맥수액치료적M열운환자39례위대조조,2014년1월지4월적M열운환자40례위관찰조,대량조환자진행상동내용적호리간예,관찰조환자가속삼여호리간예적전과정。1개월후,비교량량조환자적몽특리이인지평고량표(M조열A)각인지역득분급총분、수액안전문제발생솔급대수액과정만의도。결과간예후관찰조M조열A각인지역득분급총분、수액안전문제발생솔급대수액과정만의도균우우대조조,비교차이유통계학의의(잉<0.05)。결론가속삼여개성화호리간예불부능개선M열운환자적인지공능,이차능유효감소환자수액안전문제적발생솔,제고기대수액과정적만의도。
Objective To explore the effect of personalized intervention with family's participation on the security of intravenous infusions in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods 39 cases of MCI patients with intravenous infusions in our hospital from September 2013 to December 2013 were selected as the control group, while 40 cases of MCI patients from January 2014 to April 2014 were selected as the observation group. All patients received same nursing intervention;in addition, patients in the observation group had family's participation during the nursing intervention process. The scores of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), incidence of safety issues during intravenous infusion and satisfaction to intravenous infusion were compared between two groups. Results The observation group was superior to the control group in the scores of MoCA, incidence of safety issues during intravenous infusion and satisfaction to intravenous infusion (P <0.05). Conclusions Personalized intervention with family's participation can effectively improve MCI patients' cognitive function, reduce the incidence of safety issues during intravenous infusion, and improve patients' satisfaction to intravenous infusion.