临床医学工程
臨床醫學工程
림상의학공정
CLINICAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING
2014年
10期
1303-1304
,共2页
长托宁%阿托品%氯胺酮%静脉全麻%儿童
長託寧%阿託品%氯胺酮%靜脈全痳%兒童
장탁저%아탁품%록알동%정맥전마%인동
Liquid nitrogen freezing method%CO2 laser method%5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic%Perianal condyloma
目的：对液氮冷冻法联合5原氨基酮戊酸光动力与悦韵2联合5原氨基酮戊酸光动力治疗肛周尖锐湿疣的效果进行分析比较。方法选取符合条件的50例患者为研究对象，将其随机分为研究组和对照组，其中研究组27例，对照组23例。对研究组病例采用液氮冷冻法联合5原氨基酮戊酸光动力治疗，对照组患者使用悦韵2联合5原氨基酮戊酸光动力治疗，对比分析两种疗法的治疗总有效率及复发率。结果研究组总有效率为85.2豫，对照组总有效率为82.6豫，研究组治疗总有效率高于对照组，但差异无统计学意义(孕>0.05)；研究组复发率为7.4豫，对照组复发率为13.0豫，差异有统计学意义(孕<0.05)。结论液氮冷冻联合光动力治疗肛周尖锐湿疣效果略优于用悦韵2激光联合光动力治疗，同时液氮冷冻联合光动力治疗方法的复发率显著低于悦韵2激光联合光动力疗法。
目的：對液氮冷凍法聯閤5原氨基酮戊痠光動力與悅韻2聯閤5原氨基酮戊痠光動力治療肛週尖銳濕疣的效果進行分析比較。方法選取符閤條件的50例患者為研究對象，將其隨機分為研究組和對照組，其中研究組27例，對照組23例。對研究組病例採用液氮冷凍法聯閤5原氨基酮戊痠光動力治療，對照組患者使用悅韻2聯閤5原氨基酮戊痠光動力治療，對比分析兩種療法的治療總有效率及複髮率。結果研究組總有效率為85.2豫，對照組總有效率為82.6豫，研究組治療總有效率高于對照組，但差異無統計學意義(孕>0.05)；研究組複髮率為7.4豫，對照組複髮率為13.0豫，差異有統計學意義(孕<0.05)。結論液氮冷凍聯閤光動力治療肛週尖銳濕疣效果略優于用悅韻2激光聯閤光動力治療，同時液氮冷凍聯閤光動力治療方法的複髮率顯著低于悅韻2激光聯閤光動力療法。
목적：대액담냉동법연합5원안기동무산광동력여열운2연합5원안기동무산광동력치료항주첨예습우적효과진행분석비교。방법선취부합조건적50례환자위연구대상，장기수궤분위연구조화대조조，기중연구조27례，대조조23례。대연구조병례채용액담냉동법연합5원안기동무산광동력치료，대조조환자사용열운2연합5원안기동무산광동력치료，대비분석량충요법적치료총유효솔급복발솔。결과연구조총유효솔위85.2예，대조조총유효솔위82.6예，연구조치료총유효솔고우대조조，단차이무통계학의의(잉>0.05)；연구조복발솔위7.4예，대조조복발솔위13.0예，차이유통계학의의(잉<0.05)。결론액담냉동연합광동력치료항주첨예습우효과략우우용열운2격광연합광동력치료，동시액담냉동연합광동력치료방법적복발솔현저저우열운2격광연합광동력요법。
Objective To analyse the effect of liquid nitrogen freezing method in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic and CO2 in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic in the treatment of perianal condyloma. Methods 50 cases of eligible patients were selected and randomly divided into study group and control group, with 27 patients in the study group and 23 patients in the control group. The study group received liquid nitrogen freezing method in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy, the control group was given CO2 in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy. The total effective rate and recurrence rate of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the study group was 85.2%, higher than 82.6% of the control group, but without statistically significant difference (P >0.05); the recurrence rate of the study group was 7.4%, significantly higher than 13.0%of the control group, with statistically significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusions The effect of liquid nitrogen frozen in combination with photodynamic in treating perianal condyloma is slightly better than CO2 laser combined with photodynamic therapy;while the recurrence rate of liquid nitrogen cryotherapy in combination with photodynamic is significantly lower than CO2 laser and photodynamic therapy.
