CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较顶空-固相微萃取法( HS-SPME)和水蒸气蒸馏法( SD)提取红景天中挥发性成分差异。方法：采用顶空固相微萃取法和水蒸气蒸馏法提取红景天挥发性成分，并用GC-MS联用技术对红景天的挥发性成分进行分析。结果：顶空固相微萃取法鉴定出39种挥发性化学成分，水蒸气蒸馏法鉴定出16种挥发性化学成分，共有成分4种。结论：2种方法鉴定出的挥发性成分及其相对含量上存在一定差异，与水蒸气蒸馏法比较，顶空固相微萃取法所得挥发性成分数目和种类较多，具有更高的检索匹配度和灵敏度，有明显的优越性。
목적：비교정공-고상미췌취법( HS-SPME)화수증기증류법( SD)제취홍경천중휘발성성분차이。방법：채용정공고상미췌취법화수증기증류법제취홍경천휘발성성분，병용GC-MS련용기술대홍경천적휘발성성분진행분석。결과：정공고상미췌취법감정출39충휘발성화학성분，수증기증류법감정출16충휘발성화학성분，공유성분4충。결론：2충방법감정출적휘발성성분급기상대함량상존재일정차이，여수증기증류법비교，정공고상미췌취법소득휘발성성분수목화충류교다，구유경고적검색필배도화령민도，유명현적우월성。
Objective: To compare the volatile compounds extracted from Rhodiola renulata respectively by HS-SPME and SD. Methods:The volatile constituents from Rhodiola crenulata were extracted respectively by HS-SPME and SD, and then the contents and the names were confirmed by GC-MS. Results:Totally 39 compounds were identified from Rhodiola crenulata by HS-SPME while 16 ones were identified by SD. Among them, 4 common compounds were detected. Conclusion: There are some differences between the two methods. Compared with SD, HS-SPME is obviously better because more volatile constituents can be extracted from the herb, furthermore, HS-SPME has notable advantages of higher retrieval matching and sensitivity.