牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志
牙體牙髓牙週病學雜誌
아체아수아주병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CONSERVATIVE DENTISTRY
2014年
10期
599-601
,共3页
季娟娟%姚霜%刘晓君%杨鹴%周治%沈勇%杨萍%周新
季娟娟%姚霜%劉曉君%楊鹴%週治%瀋勇%楊萍%週新
계연연%요상%류효군%양상%주치%침용%양평%주신
垂直型牙槽骨吸收%安氏分类%矢状骨面型%垂直骨面型
垂直型牙槽骨吸收%安氏分類%矢狀骨麵型%垂直骨麵型
수직형아조골흡수%안씨분류%시상골면형%수직골면형
vertical resorption%Angle′s classification%sagittal skeletal patterns%vertical skeletal patterns
目的:探讨成人错牙合畸形的分类与牙槽骨垂直吸收间的关系。方法:选择来我院行正畸治疗的18岁以上患者450例,对治疗前的石膏模型及全颌曲面断层片的辅助检查进行统计,按不同错牙合畸形分类标准进行诊断分类,并对牙槽骨垂直吸收进行统计分析。结果:按安氏错牙合畸形和矢状骨面型分类后,牙槽骨垂直吸收的患病率无显著差异(P>0.05);按垂直骨面型(FH-MP平面)分类后,均角、低角和高角的垂直型牙槽骨吸收患病率分别为22.2%、41.2%和32.9%(P<0.05),在两两比较中,低角和高角的垂直型牙槽骨吸收患病率均明显高于均角成年错牙合患者(P<0.05),而低角与高角组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:在成年错牙合患者中,异常的垂直骨面型与牙槽骨的垂直吸收有一定相关性,提示临床治疗中对具有垂直向不调的成年错牙合畸形患者,更应关注其牙周健康及定期进行牙周维护性治疗。
目的:探討成人錯牙閤畸形的分類與牙槽骨垂直吸收間的關繫。方法:選擇來我院行正畸治療的18歲以上患者450例,對治療前的石膏模型及全頜麯麵斷層片的輔助檢查進行統計,按不同錯牙閤畸形分類標準進行診斷分類,併對牙槽骨垂直吸收進行統計分析。結果:按安氏錯牙閤畸形和矢狀骨麵型分類後,牙槽骨垂直吸收的患病率無顯著差異(P>0.05);按垂直骨麵型(FH-MP平麵)分類後,均角、低角和高角的垂直型牙槽骨吸收患病率分彆為22.2%、41.2%和32.9%(P<0.05),在兩兩比較中,低角和高角的垂直型牙槽骨吸收患病率均明顯高于均角成年錯牙閤患者(P<0.05),而低角與高角組間無統計學差異(P>0.05)。結論:在成年錯牙閤患者中,異常的垂直骨麵型與牙槽骨的垂直吸收有一定相關性,提示臨床治療中對具有垂直嚮不調的成年錯牙閤畸形患者,更應關註其牙週健康及定期進行牙週維護性治療。
목적:탐토성인착아합기형적분류여아조골수직흡수간적관계。방법:선택래아원행정기치료적18세이상환자450례,대치료전적석고모형급전합곡면단층편적보조검사진행통계,안불동착아합기형분류표준진행진단분류,병대아조골수직흡수진행통계분석。결과:안안씨착아합기형화시상골면형분류후,아조골수직흡수적환병솔무현저차이(P>0.05);안수직골면형(FH-MP평면)분류후,균각、저각화고각적수직형아조골흡수환병솔분별위22.2%、41.2%화32.9%(P<0.05),재량량비교중,저각화고각적수직형아조골흡수환병솔균명현고우균각성년착아합환자(P<0.05),이저각여고각조간무통계학차이(P>0.05)。결론:재성년착아합환자중,이상적수직골면형여아조골적수직흡수유일정상관성,제시림상치료중대구유수직향불조적성년착아합기형환자,경응관주기아주건강급정기진행아주유호성치료。
AIM:To investigate the relationship between different kinds of malocclusion and vertical alveo-lar resorption.METHODS:450 adult patients underwent orthodontic treatments were included.The malocclusion of the patients was examined and classified by orthopantomography and plaster cast,alveolar vertical resorption was meas-ured and compared among malocclusion types .RESULTS:No significant difference between the alveolar vertical re-sorption and different types of malocclusion was observed according to either Angle's diagnose system or sagittal skeletal diagnose system(P>0.05).According to the vertical skeletal diagnose system (FH-MP),vertical resorption in the patiens with average angle,low angle and the high angle were 22.2%,41.2%and 32.9%respectively.average angle vs low angle or high angle (P<0.05),low angle vs high angle (P>0.05).CONCLUSION:Different molar posi-tion and sagittal position of maxillary and mandible may not affect the vertical alveolar resorption rate.But the vertical position of maxillary and mandible may affect the vertical alveolar resorption.