CAJ | 학술논문

本文在梳理国内外关于智慧城市的理论研究基础上，对当前9个智慧城市评价指标体系进行了综合比较分析，提出了关于指标选取、权重计算和综合评价方法选择的建议，在指标选取上应强调产出效益指标、主客观结合、具备动态性和重视城市个性；在指标权重计算上，不同模块应选择不同的计算方法；在评价方法选择上，由于存在大量相关性较强的指标，数据挖掘方法是一个比较好的选择，如神经网络法，遗传算法，支持向量机等。
본문재소리국내외관우지혜성시적이론연구기출상，대당전9개지혜성시평개지표체계진행료종합비교분석，제출료관우지표선취、권중계산화종합평개방법선택적건의，재지표선취상응강조산출효익지표、주객관결합、구비동태성화중시성시개성；재지표권중계산상，불동모괴응선택불동적계산방법；재평개방법선택상，유우존재대량상관성교강적지표，수거알굴방법시일개비교호적선택，여신경망락법，유전산법，지지향량궤등。
Based on the theoretical study of smart city in China and abroad, the paper makes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the current nine smart city evaluation systems, and proposes suggestions on the evaluation index selection, weight calculation and comprehensive evaluation method. The index selection should emphasize on the output benefit index, combination of subjectivity and objectivity, dynamic, and city individuality. In term of index weight calculation, different calculation methods should be selected for each module. In term of evaluation method selection, if there are many closely related indexes, data mining method will be a better choice, such as neural network, genetic algorithm and support vector machine.