实用骨科杂志
實用骨科雜誌
실용골과잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL ORTHOPEDICS
2014年
11期
982-985
,共4页
任继鑫%张建政%刘智%何红英%郭永明%韩力%孙天胜
任繼鑫%張建政%劉智%何紅英%郭永明%韓力%孫天勝
임계흠%장건정%류지%하홍영%곽영명%한력%손천성
股骨干骨折%股骨颈骨折%骨折固定术%内
股骨榦骨摺%股骨頸骨摺%骨摺固定術%內
고골간골절%고골경골절%골절고정술%내
femoral shaft fracture%femoral neck fracture%fracture fixation%internal
目的:探讨股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧髋部骨折的手术适应证。方法根据入选标准和排除标准,回顾2001年1月至2011年1月收治的股骨干合并同侧髋部骨折病例15例,其中男14例,女1例;年龄21~64岁,平均35.5岁。通过比较术前、术后即刻、术后1、3、6和12个月的临床和影像学随访结果,评估骨折愈合情况和并发症,分析股骨重建钉治疗股骨干合并同侧髋部骨折的最佳适应证。结果全部病例获得随访,随访时间14~48个月,平均27. 8个月。13例股骨干骨折一期获得骨性愈合,愈合时间(6.2±4.1)个月,14例股骨颈骨折一期获得骨性愈合,愈合时间(5.4±2.9)个月。合并症:1例股骨远端骨折由于狭部限制,重建钉过细,局部旋转不稳定,并发肥大性骨不连;1例股骨中段骨折延迟愈合;2例股骨干旋转畸形愈合;1例股骨颈头下型骨折不愈合。末次随访时进行 Fried-man-Wyman 评定,优12例,良 2例,差 1例,优良率93.3%。结论股骨重建钉适用于绝大部分股骨干骨折合并髋部骨折,尤其是股骨颈基底部骨折合并股骨干近端或狭部骨折。但对于股骨颈头下型、难复位的股骨颈骨折合并股骨干远端骨折,股骨重建钉并非最佳的治疗方案。
目的:探討股骨重建釘治療股骨榦閤併同側髖部骨摺的手術適應證。方法根據入選標準和排除標準,迴顧2001年1月至2011年1月收治的股骨榦閤併同側髖部骨摺病例15例,其中男14例,女1例;年齡21~64歲,平均35.5歲。通過比較術前、術後即刻、術後1、3、6和12箇月的臨床和影像學隨訪結果,評估骨摺愈閤情況和併髮癥,分析股骨重建釘治療股骨榦閤併同側髖部骨摺的最佳適應證。結果全部病例穫得隨訪,隨訪時間14~48箇月,平均27. 8箇月。13例股骨榦骨摺一期穫得骨性愈閤,愈閤時間(6.2±4.1)箇月,14例股骨頸骨摺一期穫得骨性愈閤,愈閤時間(5.4±2.9)箇月。閤併癥:1例股骨遠耑骨摺由于狹部限製,重建釘過細,跼部鏇轉不穩定,併髮肥大性骨不連;1例股骨中段骨摺延遲愈閤;2例股骨榦鏇轉畸形愈閤;1例股骨頸頭下型骨摺不愈閤。末次隨訪時進行 Fried-man-Wyman 評定,優12例,良 2例,差 1例,優良率93.3%。結論股骨重建釘適用于絕大部分股骨榦骨摺閤併髖部骨摺,尤其是股骨頸基底部骨摺閤併股骨榦近耑或狹部骨摺。但對于股骨頸頭下型、難複位的股骨頸骨摺閤併股骨榦遠耑骨摺,股骨重建釘併非最佳的治療方案。
목적:탐토고골중건정치료고골간합병동측관부골절적수술괄응증。방법근거입선표준화배제표준,회고2001년1월지2011년1월수치적고골간합병동측관부골절병례15례,기중남14례,녀1례;년령21~64세,평균35.5세。통과비교술전、술후즉각、술후1、3、6화12개월적림상화영상학수방결과,평고골절유합정황화병발증,분석고골중건정치료고골간합병동측관부골절적최가괄응증。결과전부병례획득수방,수방시간14~48개월,평균27. 8개월。13례고골간골절일기획득골성유합,유합시간(6.2±4.1)개월,14례고골경골절일기획득골성유합,유합시간(5.4±2.9)개월。합병증:1례고골원단골절유우협부한제,중건정과세,국부선전불은정,병발비대성골불련;1례고골중단골절연지유합;2례고골간선전기형유합;1례고골경두하형골절불유합。말차수방시진행 Fried-man-Wyman 평정,우12례,량 2례,차 1례,우량솔93.3%。결론고골중건정괄용우절대부분고골간골절합병관부골절,우기시고골경기저부골절합병고골간근단혹협부골절。단대우고골경두하형、난복위적고골경골절합병고골간원단골절,고골중건정병비최가적치료방안。
Objective To review our experience with reconstruction intramedullary nailing in the treatment of ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures. Methods From Jan 2001 to Jan 2011,fifteen patients with ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures were treated with reconstruction intramedullary nails and followed-up in our division. Patients were evaluated at 1,3, 6,12 months after surgery,and then every year postoperatively. Results All patients were followed-up for an average of 27. 8 months(range,14 ~ 48 months). Neck fractures healed in 14 patients,and shaft fractures healed in 13 patients. The average u-nion time was 5. 4 months for the hip fractures and 6. 2 months for the shaft fractures. There was one case of non-union of the femoral neck fracture and one case of nonunion and one case of delayed union and two cases of malunion of femoral shaft frac-tures. Conclusion Reconstruction intramedullary nail has been an excellent choice for most cases of ipsilateral hip and femo-ral shaft fractures,but should not be preferred in subcapital fractures or irreducible femoral neck fractures and distal femoral shaft fractures.