CAJ | 학술논문

为摆脱地方干扰，增强法院依法独立公正审理行政案件的能力，而作为行政审判体制改革试点来推进与行政管理区域有限分离的行政诉讼集中管辖制度，在一定程度上能够保证宪法、法律赋予法院的行政审判权有效运行。这种做法实为改革过程中的无奈之举，故而需要宽容、理解和支持。但是，改革试点也面临着如何符合实定法相关规定的挑战。对于确实具有合理性和实效性的改革举措，应当通过修法予以合法性支撑。不应将集中管辖确立为我国行政诉讼的一般制度，因为它不能有效根除行政诉讼的体制障碍，无法充分利用各级法院既有资源，与行政审判体制改革的长远目标相悖；要根除行政诉讼的体制障碍，需要在行政体制改革上下功夫，真正确立尊重法院裁判的行政责任体系。在深化司法体制改革的过程中，需要对行政诉讼集中管辖的试错探索予以科学评价，对实践和理论误区予以逐步矫正，确立正确的方法论和科学的行政诉讼管辖制度，以基层管辖、本地管辖等法定管辖为一般管辖，以提级管辖、异地管辖等裁定管辖为补充管辖。
위파탈지방간우，증강법원의법독립공정심리행정안건적능력，이작위행정심판체제개혁시점래추진여행정관리구역유한분리적행정소송집중관할제도，재일정정도상능구보증헌법、법율부여법원적행정심판권유효운행。저충주법실위개혁과정중적무내지거，고이수요관용、리해화지지。단시，개혁시점야면림착여하부합실정법상관규정적도전。대우학실구유합이성화실효성적개혁거조，응당통과수법여이합법성지탱。불응장집중관할학립위아국행정소송적일반제도，인위타불능유효근제행정소송적체제장애，무법충분이용각급법원기유자원，여행정심판체제개혁적장원목표상패；요근제행정소송적체제장애，수요재행정체제개혁상하공부，진정학립존중법원재판적행정책임체계。재심화사법체제개혁적과정중，수요대행정소송집중관할적시착탐색여이과학평개，대실천화이론오구여이축보교정，학립정학적방법론화과학적행정소송관할제도，이기층관할、본지관할등법정관할위일반관할，이제급관할、이지관할등재정관할위보충관할。
In order to get rid of local interference and to enhance the independent and impartial ability of administrative case judgment of the court, the administrative litigation centralized?jurisdiction system, with limited separation from the administration district, is promoted as the pilot of administrative adjudication system reform, to some extent ensuring the effective operation of administrative adjudication endowed by the constitution and laws to be carried out by the court. However, such approach is only because of no alternative ways during the reform process, needing tolerance, understanding and support. This reform pilot also faces the challenge of being compliance with related regulations. As for the reform approach with real reasonableness and effectiveness, related laws should be amended to give legitimacy support. But as for the centralized?jurisdiction system, it should not be set up as a common system of the administrative litigation since it cannot effectively eliminate the institutional barriers in the administrative litigation or make full use of existing resources of courts at all levels, being contrary to the long-term objective of administrative adjudication system reform. In order to effectively eliminate the institutional barriers in the administrative litigation, efforts should be paid to administrative system reform to really establish an administrative responsibility system respecting the court judgment. During the process of deepening judicial system reform, scientiifc evaluation should be made onto the attempting exploration of the administrative litigation centralized?jurisdiction system and practical and theoretical errors should be corrected gradually to establish correct methodology and a scientiifc administrative litigation jurisdiction system, i.e. letting legal jurisdiction like primary jurisdiction and local jurisdiction be as general jurisdiction, and jurisdiction by order like high-level jurisdiction and jurisdiction of different place be as supplementary jurisdiction.