农业工程学报
農業工程學報
농업공정학보
2014年
20期
244-251
,共8页
陈广银%杜静%常志州%叶小梅%徐跃定%张建英
陳廣銀%杜靜%常誌州%葉小梅%徐躍定%張建英
진엄은%두정%상지주%협소매%서약정%장건영
沼气:秸秆%发酵%猪粪废水%有机负荷%秸秆床反应器%容积产气率
沼氣:秸稈%髮酵%豬糞廢水%有機負荷%秸稈床反應器%容積產氣率
소기:갈간%발효%저분폐수%유궤부하%갈간상반응기%용적산기솔
biogas%straw%fermentation%swine wastewater%organic loading rate%straw-bed bioreactor%volumetric biogas production rate
为同时解决农业秸秆和分散式畜禽养殖废水的资源化问题,以打捆秸秆为固定相,以猪粪废水为流动相,构筑秸秆床厌氧反应器,并在反应器后部连接废水二级厌氧反应器,研究秸秆床发酵系统的产气特性及可行性。结果表明:秸秆床发酵系统可同时处理打捆秸秆和猪粪废水,且不影响各发酵原料的厌氧生物转化率,秸秆床发酵系统中秸秆干物质产气量为394.96 mL/g,略高于秸秆单独发酵(382.11 mL/g);秸秆床发酵系统产气稳定性大幅提高,避免了单一发酵原料日产气量波动较大的问题,对产气中平均甲烷体积分数影响明显,秸秆床发酵系统、纯猪粪废水和纯秸秆发酵产气中平均甲烷体积分数分别为57.40%、60.37%和47.32%;与各物料单独发酵相比,秸秆床发酵系统平均容积产气率大幅提高,纯秸秆和猪粪废水单独发酵容积产气率仅为秸秆床发酵系统的69.42%和66.94%;试验35 d后,秸秆机械强度和孔隙度明显降低,秸秆互相粘结导气性下降,造成秸秆上浮严重及进水短流,反应器出水化学需氧量浓度快速增加并稳定在较高浓度,故在秸秆床反应器后部必须连接废水二级厌氧反应器以进一步处理秸秆床反应器出水。综合以上结果,采用秸秆床发酵系统同时处理打捆秸秆和猪粪废水是可行的,但需解决发酵后期秸秆上浮、导向性下降和进水短流等问题。
為同時解決農業秸稈和分散式畜禽養殖廢水的資源化問題,以打捆秸稈為固定相,以豬糞廢水為流動相,構築秸稈床厭氧反應器,併在反應器後部連接廢水二級厭氧反應器,研究秸稈床髮酵繫統的產氣特性及可行性。結果錶明:秸稈床髮酵繫統可同時處理打捆秸稈和豬糞廢水,且不影響各髮酵原料的厭氧生物轉化率,秸稈床髮酵繫統中秸稈榦物質產氣量為394.96 mL/g,略高于秸稈單獨髮酵(382.11 mL/g);秸稈床髮酵繫統產氣穩定性大幅提高,避免瞭單一髮酵原料日產氣量波動較大的問題,對產氣中平均甲烷體積分數影響明顯,秸稈床髮酵繫統、純豬糞廢水和純秸稈髮酵產氣中平均甲烷體積分數分彆為57.40%、60.37%和47.32%;與各物料單獨髮酵相比,秸稈床髮酵繫統平均容積產氣率大幅提高,純秸稈和豬糞廢水單獨髮酵容積產氣率僅為秸稈床髮酵繫統的69.42%和66.94%;試驗35 d後,秸稈機械彊度和孔隙度明顯降低,秸稈互相粘結導氣性下降,造成秸稈上浮嚴重及進水短流,反應器齣水化學需氧量濃度快速增加併穩定在較高濃度,故在秸稈床反應器後部必鬚連接廢水二級厭氧反應器以進一步處理秸稈床反應器齣水。綜閤以上結果,採用秸稈床髮酵繫統同時處理打捆秸稈和豬糞廢水是可行的,但需解決髮酵後期秸稈上浮、導嚮性下降和進水短流等問題。
위동시해결농업갈간화분산식축금양식폐수적자원화문제,이타곤갈간위고정상,이저분폐수위류동상,구축갈간상염양반응기,병재반응기후부련접폐수이급염양반응기,연구갈간상발효계통적산기특성급가행성。결과표명:갈간상발효계통가동시처리타곤갈간화저분폐수,차불영향각발효원료적염양생물전화솔,갈간상발효계통중갈간간물질산기량위394.96 mL/g,략고우갈간단독발효(382.11 mL/g);갈간상발효계통산기은정성대폭제고,피면료단일발효원료일산기량파동교대적문제,대산기중평균갑완체적분수영향명현,갈간상발효계통、순저분폐수화순갈간발효산기중평균갑완체적분수분별위57.40%、60.37%화47.32%;여각물료단독발효상비,갈간상발효계통평균용적산기솔대폭제고,순갈간화저분폐수단독발효용적산기솔부위갈간상발효계통적69.42%화66.94%;시험35 d후,갈간궤계강도화공극도명현강저,갈간호상점결도기성하강,조성갈간상부엄중급진수단류,반응기출수화학수양량농도쾌속증가병은정재교고농도,고재갈간상반응기후부필수련접폐수이급염양반응기이진일보처리갈간상반응기출수。종합이상결과,채용갈간상발효계통동시처리타곤갈간화저분폐수시가행적,단수해결발효후기갈간상부、도향성하강화진수단류등문제。
Agricultural straw and livestock wastewater were the main source of agricultural contaminant, how to reduce, reuse and recycle these wastes has become more and more important. Anaerobic digestion is an attractive technique for bio-waste treatment which can produce biogas and bio-fertilizer. Co-digested two and more wastes is beneficial for anaerobic digestion. By this way, we can not only get more biogas, but also reduce the investment of biogas plant. Two or more agricultural wastes were converted to biogas in one anaerobic bioreactor. Although much work has been done on anaerobic co-digestion of two or more bio-wastes, but most work was done with batch model and there was no report on anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural straw and livestock wastewater. In pig farming, swine wastewater is the main contaminant and is generated every day, so swine wastewater must be added to the anaerobic digester daily, which means that we must use semi-continuous feeding bioreactor in a pig farm biogas plant. In this study, the feasibility of straw-bed anaerobic bioreactor (SAB) was investigated. In the straw-bed bioreactor, baling straw was used as the stationary phase and swine wastewater was used as the mobile phase, and a wastewater advanced anaerobic bioreactor (USR) was connected to the posterior of the straw-bed bioreactor. The results showed that the straw-bed anaerobic digestion system (SADS) was feasible and there was no significant difference between co-digestion and mono-digestion of straw and swine wastewater. The total solid biogas yield of straw of SAB and mono-digestion were 394.96 and 382.11 mL/g, respectively. Compared to mono-digestion, the stability of daily biogas yield and average methane content of co-digestion was improved significantly. The average methane content of SADS, baling straw and swine wastewater digested alone were 57.40%, 47.32% and 60.37%, respectively. The volumetric biogas production was also improved significantly and the volumetric biogas production of treatment of baling straw and swine wastewater digested alone were 69.42% and 66.94% to that of SADS. After 35 days reaction, air permeability of baling straw was decreased which leading to more serious floating of baling straw and short flow of influent. After that, COD content of effluent increased sharply and then maintained at higher level. Meanwhile daily biogas yield of wastewater advanced anaerobic bioreactor increased sharply. Therefore, it is necessary to connect a wastewater advanced anaerobic bioreactor to the posterior of straw-bed bioreactor in order to deep purification of effluent of SAB. The above results indicated that co-digested baling straw and swine wastewater in straw-bed anaerobic digestion system is feasible and is beneficial for biogas production.