国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志
國際生殖健康/計劃生育雜誌
국제생식건강/계화생육잡지
JOURNLA OF INTERNATIONAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH/FAMILY PLANNING
2014年
4期
265-267
,共3页
王倩%杨蔚%程文兰%程堃
王倩%楊蔚%程文蘭%程堃
왕천%양위%정문란%정곤
宫颈肿瘤%癌%放射疗法%药物疗法,联合%回归分析
宮頸腫瘤%癌%放射療法%藥物療法,聯閤%迴歸分析
궁경종류%암%방사요법%약물요법,연합%회귀분석
Uterine cervical neoplasms%Carcinoma%Radiotherapy%Drug therapy,combination%Regression analysis
目的:探讨影响中晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗效果的临床病理因素。方法:对126例接受同步放化疗的中晚期宫颈癌患者进行随访,记录患者年龄、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期、病理类型、肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、无进展生存情况、总生存情况等,并分析各因素对生存情况的影响。结果:截至随访结束共79例患者存活,总生存率为62.7%,无进展患者77例,无进展生存率为61.1%。中位随访时间45个月,随访时间8~69个月。无进展生存、总生存患者比例在不同年龄组、肿瘤分级、FIGO分期水平间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤分级与无进展生存有关(P<0.05),肿瘤分级、FIGO分期对患者的总生存均有影响(P<0.05)。不良反应包括骨髓抑制(21.4%)、胃肠道反应(16.7%)、肾功能损害(6.3%)。结论:在中晚期宫颈癌患者同步放化疗过程中,肿瘤分级和FIGO分期较高的患者治疗效果较差,未来临床工作中应予以足够重视。
目的:探討影響中晚期宮頸癌同步放化療效果的臨床病理因素。方法:對126例接受同步放化療的中晚期宮頸癌患者進行隨訪,記錄患者年齡、國際婦產科聯盟(FIGO)分期、病理類型、腫瘤分級、腫瘤大小、無進展生存情況、總生存情況等,併分析各因素對生存情況的影響。結果:截至隨訪結束共79例患者存活,總生存率為62.7%,無進展患者77例,無進展生存率為61.1%。中位隨訪時間45箇月,隨訪時間8~69箇月。無進展生存、總生存患者比例在不同年齡組、腫瘤分級、FIGO分期水平間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。Cox迴歸分析顯示,腫瘤分級與無進展生存有關(P<0.05),腫瘤分級、FIGO分期對患者的總生存均有影響(P<0.05)。不良反應包括骨髓抑製(21.4%)、胃腸道反應(16.7%)、腎功能損害(6.3%)。結論:在中晚期宮頸癌患者同步放化療過程中,腫瘤分級和FIGO分期較高的患者治療效果較差,未來臨床工作中應予以足夠重視。
목적:탐토영향중만기궁경암동보방화료효과적림상병리인소。방법:대126례접수동보방화료적중만기궁경암환자진행수방,기록환자년령、국제부산과련맹(FIGO)분기、병리류형、종류분급、종류대소、무진전생존정황、총생존정황등,병분석각인소대생존정황적영향。결과:절지수방결속공79례환자존활,총생존솔위62.7%,무진전환자77례,무진전생존솔위61.1%。중위수방시간45개월,수방시간8~69개월。무진전생존、총생존환자비례재불동년령조、종류분급、FIGO분기수평간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。Cox회귀분석현시,종류분급여무진전생존유관(P<0.05),종류분급、FIGO분기대환자적총생존균유영향(P<0.05)。불량반응포괄골수억제(21.4%)、위장도반응(16.7%)、신공능손해(6.3%)。결론:재중만기궁경암환자동보방화료과정중,종류분급화FIGO분기교고적환자치료효과교차,미래림상공작중응여이족구중시。
Objective:To investigate the effect of clinical and pathological factors on the clinical outcomes in those patients with the advanced cervical cancer who were experiencing the combined therapy with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods:A total of 126 patients with the advanced cervical cancer who were receiving the radiotherapy combined with cisplatin were followed up for five years. Effect of those factors, such as FIGO stage, histological type, tumor grade and tumor size, on the survival rate was analyzed. Results:At of the end of the follow-up, 79 patients survived, and the five-year survival rate was 62.7%. 77 patients were in progression-free survival, the progression-free survival rate was 57.1%. The median follow-up was 45 months (Range=8-69). There were significant differences in the progression-free survival and the overall survival after the stratification analysis by age, level of tumor grade and FIGO classification. The Cox regression analysis showed that the tumor grade was significant related to the progression-free survival (P<0.05); and that the tumor grade and FIGO grade had a significant impact on overall survival (P<0.05). Adverse event included bone marrow suppression (21.4%), gastrointestinal reaction (16.7%) and kidney dysfunction (6.3%). Conclusions:Those patients with the advanced cervical cancer who have higher tumor grade and FIGO stage could have poor clinical outcomes of the combined therapy with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The lower survival rate in those patients should be attended in clinical practice.