情报学报
情報學報
정보학보
2014年
4期
367-374
,共8页
图书馆与情报学%知识网络%合著率%合作网络%幂律分布
圖書館與情報學%知識網絡%閤著率%閤作網絡%冪律分佈
도서관여정보학%지식망락%합저솔%합작망락%멱률분포
library and information science%knowledge networks%coauthored ratio%cooperation networks%power law distribution
科研活动里的合作现象越来越成为一种全球范围内的大趋势,表现在论文产出中是作者间的合著率在过去的100多年内越来越高,同时这种活动中的合作关系也越来越复杂。本文以图书馆与情报学领域内的论文合著为例,主要针对科研合作网络展开研究,生成了以合著论文里文献生产者共现为特征的合作矩阵与网络,并验证了作者合作网络的无标度特征。本文将合作网络具体细化为三种类型:作者合作网络、机构合作网络和国家合作网络,并将这三种网络使用复杂网络与社会网络技术结合进行分析并作了横向对比。结果发现图书馆与情报学领域内的作者合作网络是非连通的稀疏网络,科学家之间已成多个研究社团,机构与国家合作网络都有较短的平均路径、较高的网络密度和集聚系数。论文最后还对目前常用的合作网络研究方法进行了反思和展望。
科研活動裏的閤作現象越來越成為一種全毬範圍內的大趨勢,錶現在論文產齣中是作者間的閤著率在過去的100多年內越來越高,同時這種活動中的閤作關繫也越來越複雜。本文以圖書館與情報學領域內的論文閤著為例,主要針對科研閤作網絡展開研究,生成瞭以閤著論文裏文獻生產者共現為特徵的閤作矩陣與網絡,併驗證瞭作者閤作網絡的無標度特徵。本文將閤作網絡具體細化為三種類型:作者閤作網絡、機構閤作網絡和國傢閤作網絡,併將這三種網絡使用複雜網絡與社會網絡技術結閤進行分析併作瞭橫嚮對比。結果髮現圖書館與情報學領域內的作者閤作網絡是非連通的稀疏網絡,科學傢之間已成多箇研究社糰,機構與國傢閤作網絡都有較短的平均路徑、較高的網絡密度和集聚繫數。論文最後還對目前常用的閤作網絡研究方法進行瞭反思和展望。
과연활동리적합작현상월래월성위일충전구범위내적대추세,표현재논문산출중시작자간적합저솔재과거적100다년내월래월고,동시저충활동중적합작관계야월래월복잡。본문이도서관여정보학영역내적논문합저위례,주요침대과연합작망락전개연구,생성료이합저논문리문헌생산자공현위특정적합작구진여망락,병험증료작자합작망락적무표도특정。본문장합작망락구체세화위삼충류형:작자합작망락、궤구합작망락화국가합작망락,병장저삼충망락사용복잡망락여사회망락기술결합진행분석병작료횡향대비。결과발현도서관여정보학영역내적작자합작망락시비련통적희소망락,과학가지간이성다개연구사단,궤구여국가합작망락도유교단적평균로경、교고적망락밀도화집취계수。논문최후환대목전상용적합작망락연구방법진행료반사화전망。
Collaboration efforts in research activities is increasingly becoming a worldwide trend, which was reflected in the ratio for collaborators proportions in all the research papers communities higher and higher in the past one hundred years, while the relationship in such activities becomes increasingly complex. In this paper, taking the cooperation phenomenon in the field of library and information science as an example, the scientific collaboration networks was mainly explored, the cooccurrence matrix characterized by cooperation networks was produced, and the author scalefree networks phenomena was verified. Then the knowledge networks were defined clearly as author cooperation networks, institutions cooperation networks and national cooperation networks, all these three networks were studied with complex networks and social network technologies analysis under a comparison perspective. The results showed that the cooperation networks in the field of library and information science is of nonsparse network connectivity, they performed a plurality of associations between scientists, institutions and nations with a shorter average path, higher network density and clustering coefficient. At last a thoroughly reflection and research prospect on cooperation networks were proposed.