天津医药
天津醫藥
천진의약
TIANJIN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
11期
1127-1129
,共3页
张坦%张晟%忻晓洁%王晓庆%杨凡
張坦%張晟%忻曉潔%王曉慶%楊凡
장탄%장성%흔효길%왕효경%양범
甲状腺结节%超声检查%年龄组%甲状腺影像和数据报告系统
甲狀腺結節%超聲檢查%年齡組%甲狀腺影像和數據報告繫統
갑상선결절%초성검사%년령조%갑상선영상화수거보고계통
thyroid nodule%ultrasonography%age groups%TI-RADS
目的:探讨甲状腺超声影像和数据报告系统(TI-RADS)分级在诊断不同年龄甲状腺结节中的应用价值。方法选择527例甲状腺结节患者,按年龄段分为4组(26~35岁组、36~45岁组、46~55岁组、56~65岁组),采用TI-RADS对4个年龄组的甲状腺结节患者进行分级,并与病理结果对比分析。结果 TI-RADS分级对低年龄组(26~35岁组和36~45岁组)结节患者的诊断阳性预测值、阴性预测值和正确率均高于90%;对46~55岁组的阳性预测值为81.5%,阴性预测值为87.5%,正确率为81.9%;对56~65岁组的阳性预测值为76.6%,阴性预测值为88.8%,正确率为77.9%。TI-RADS系统对56~65岁甲状腺结节患者的诊断率低于其他年龄分组。结论 TI-RADS分级方法受年龄因素的影响,对高年龄组的诊断率低于低年龄组。
目的:探討甲狀腺超聲影像和數據報告繫統(TI-RADS)分級在診斷不同年齡甲狀腺結節中的應用價值。方法選擇527例甲狀腺結節患者,按年齡段分為4組(26~35歲組、36~45歲組、46~55歲組、56~65歲組),採用TI-RADS對4箇年齡組的甲狀腺結節患者進行分級,併與病理結果對比分析。結果 TI-RADS分級對低年齡組(26~35歲組和36~45歲組)結節患者的診斷暘性預測值、陰性預測值和正確率均高于90%;對46~55歲組的暘性預測值為81.5%,陰性預測值為87.5%,正確率為81.9%;對56~65歲組的暘性預測值為76.6%,陰性預測值為88.8%,正確率為77.9%。TI-RADS繫統對56~65歲甲狀腺結節患者的診斷率低于其他年齡分組。結論 TI-RADS分級方法受年齡因素的影響,對高年齡組的診斷率低于低年齡組。
목적:탐토갑상선초성영상화수거보고계통(TI-RADS)분급재진단불동년령갑상선결절중적응용개치。방법선택527례갑상선결절환자,안년령단분위4조(26~35세조、36~45세조、46~55세조、56~65세조),채용TI-RADS대4개년령조적갑상선결절환자진행분급,병여병리결과대비분석。결과 TI-RADS분급대저년령조(26~35세조화36~45세조)결절환자적진단양성예측치、음성예측치화정학솔균고우90%;대46~55세조적양성예측치위81.5%,음성예측치위87.5%,정학솔위81.9%;대56~65세조적양성예측치위76.6%,음성예측치위88.8%,정학솔위77.9%。TI-RADS계통대56~65세갑상선결절환자적진단솔저우기타년령분조。결론 TI-RADS분급방법수년령인소적영향,대고년령조적진단솔저우저년령조。
Objective To explore the applied value of thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) strati?fication in diagnosing thyroid nodules in patients with different ages.Methods A total of 527 patients with thyroid nod?ules (aged 26-65) were divided into four groups:aged 26-35 group, aged 36-45 group, aged 46-55 group and aged 56-65 group. TI-RADS was used to evaluate patients in four groups. The results of TI-RADS were compared with the pathologic di?agnostic analysis. Results For the low aged groups (aged 26-35 group and aged 36-45 group), the positive predictive val?ue, the negative predictive value and accuracy rate were more than 90%. With regard to the patients aged 46-55, the positive and negative predictive values and accuracy rate were 81.5%, 87.5%, and 81.9%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values, accuracy rate were 76.6%,88.8%and 77.9%for patients aged 56-65 group. The diagnostic rate of TI-RADS in patients with thyroid lesions was lower in aged 56-65 group than that of other groups. Conclusion TI-RADS method is affected by age. The diagnostic rate is lower in the high age group than that of the low age group.