实用防盲技术
實用防盲技術
실용방맹기술
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL PREVENTING BLIND
2014年
4期
153-156
,共4页
曾令辉%刘广进%邢文君%张阳%刘婷婷
曾令輝%劉廣進%邢文君%張暘%劉婷婷
증령휘%류엄진%형문군%장양%류정정
视网膜分支静脉阻塞%黄斑水肿%雷珠单抗%激光光凝
視網膜分支靜脈阻塞%黃斑水腫%雷珠單抗%激光光凝
시망막분지정맥조새%황반수종%뢰주단항%격광광응
Branch retinal vein occlusion%Lucentis%Macular edema%Laser
目的:观察玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗联合黄斑区格栅样光凝治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)继发黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性。方法据荧光素眼底血管造影(FFA)对30例(30眼)视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者随机分为2组:第1组(14眼)单纯行黄斑区格栅样光凝(GLP);第2组(16眼)玻璃体腔连续注射3次雷珠单抗0.05ml/(0.5mg),每次间隔1个月,第1次注射雷珠单抗7天后行GLP治疗。随访6个月,观察最佳矫正视力(BCVA)及光学相关断层扫描(OCT)检查黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)的变化。结果6个月后两组患者最佳矫正视力(BCVA)均提高,联合治疗组优于单纯GLP组(P<0.05)。OCT显示第1组黄斑中心凹厚度平均降低236.4±113.0μm,第2组平均降低386.6±195.5μm,联合治疗组优于单纯GLP组(P<0.05)。结论联合治疗明显优于单独激光治疗,玻璃体腔内注射雷珠单抗联合黄斑区格栅样光凝术治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿安全有效。
目的:觀察玻璃體腔註射雷珠單抗聯閤黃斑區格柵樣光凝治療視網膜分支靜脈阻塞(BRVO)繼髮黃斑水腫的療效和安全性。方法據熒光素眼底血管造影(FFA)對30例(30眼)視網膜分支靜脈阻塞繼髮黃斑水腫患者隨機分為2組:第1組(14眼)單純行黃斑區格柵樣光凝(GLP);第2組(16眼)玻璃體腔連續註射3次雷珠單抗0.05ml/(0.5mg),每次間隔1箇月,第1次註射雷珠單抗7天後行GLP治療。隨訪6箇月,觀察最佳矯正視力(BCVA)及光學相關斷層掃描(OCT)檢查黃斑中心凹厚度(CMT)的變化。結果6箇月後兩組患者最佳矯正視力(BCVA)均提高,聯閤治療組優于單純GLP組(P<0.05)。OCT顯示第1組黃斑中心凹厚度平均降低236.4±113.0μm,第2組平均降低386.6±195.5μm,聯閤治療組優于單純GLP組(P<0.05)。結論聯閤治療明顯優于單獨激光治療,玻璃體腔內註射雷珠單抗聯閤黃斑區格柵樣光凝術治療視網膜分支靜脈阻塞繼髮黃斑水腫安全有效。
목적:관찰파리체강주사뢰주단항연합황반구격책양광응치료시망막분지정맥조새(BRVO)계발황반수종적료효화안전성。방법거형광소안저혈관조영(FFA)대30례(30안)시망막분지정맥조새계발황반수종환자수궤분위2조:제1조(14안)단순행황반구격책양광응(GLP);제2조(16안)파리체강련속주사3차뢰주단항0.05ml/(0.5mg),매차간격1개월,제1차주사뢰주단항7천후행GLP치료。수방6개월,관찰최가교정시력(BCVA)급광학상관단층소묘(OCT)검사황반중심요후도(CMT)적변화。결과6개월후량조환자최가교정시력(BCVA)균제고,연합치료조우우단순GLP조(P<0.05)。OCT현시제1조황반중심요후도평균강저236.4±113.0μm,제2조평균강저386.6±195.5μm,연합치료조우우단순GLP조(P<0.05)。결론연합치료명현우우단독격광치료,파리체강내주사뢰주단항연합황반구격책양광응술치료시망막분지정맥조새계발황반수종안전유효。
Objetive To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection with ranibizumab combined grid laser photocoagulation for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO).Materials and Methods:Thirty eyes of 30 patients of BRVO were randomized into two groups:Group 1(14 eyes)received grid laser photocoagulation treatment (GLP) alone, Group 2(16 eyes)received three loading doses of intravitreal injection with ranibizumab at monthly interval st(i.e. 0, 1,&2 months)+standard laser treatment 7 days after the 1 injection. Outcome measure noted at 6 months follow-up were the improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT).Results At 6 months follow-up, both groups of patients’ best corrected visual acuity were improved. The combined treatment group was better than simple GLP group(P<0.05);OCT display that CMT of groups 1 decreased by an average of 208.7um, CMT of groups 2 decreased by an average of 312.9um, The combined treatment group was better than simple GLP group(P<0.05).Conclusion The gain in BCVA and reduction in CMT were better with combination therapy. It is effective and safe in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion to.