兰州大学学报(自然科学版)
蘭州大學學報(自然科學版)
란주대학학보(자연과학판)
JOURNAL OF LANZHOU UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCES)
2014年
5期
692-698
,共7页
巩杰%高彦净%张玲玲%谢余初%赵彩霞%钱大文
鞏傑%高彥淨%張玲玲%謝餘初%趙綵霞%錢大文
공걸%고언정%장령령%사여초%조채하%전대문
地形位指数%分布指数%景观格局%生态风险
地形位指數%分佈指數%景觀格跼%生態風險
지형위지수%분포지수%경관격국%생태풍험
terrain niche index%distribution index%landscape pattern%ecological risks
以甘肃省白龙江流域1990,2002,2010年土地利用数据和30 m分辨率DEM为基础,基于景观格局指数、生态环境脆弱度、地形位指数及分布指数开展白龙江流域地形位梯度上的生态风险研究。结果表明:20年间景观生态风险的水平分布格局发生了一定改变,低、较低和中等风险区的范围扩大,高和较高风险区的范围缩小;高风险、较高风险和中等风险等级的优势分布区间主要为人为活动干扰剧烈,植被覆盖度低的中低地形位区段,低风险和较低风险等级的优势分布区间主要为林草广布、植被覆盖度高的中高地形位区段;研究时段内生态风险有所缓和,但是中等风险增加,分布范围向更高的地形位扩展,高和较高生态风险的分布范围仍广泛。应针对不同地形位梯度上的生态风险区,加强资源利用规划,合理开发和利用自然资源,降低不合理生产活动与干扰的生态风险,因地制宜,进行生态建设和人类活动管控,促进甘肃省南部山区的可持续发展。
以甘肅省白龍江流域1990,2002,2010年土地利用數據和30 m分辨率DEM為基礎,基于景觀格跼指數、生態環境脆弱度、地形位指數及分佈指數開展白龍江流域地形位梯度上的生態風險研究。結果錶明:20年間景觀生態風險的水平分佈格跼髮生瞭一定改變,低、較低和中等風險區的範圍擴大,高和較高風險區的範圍縮小;高風險、較高風險和中等風險等級的優勢分佈區間主要為人為活動榦擾劇烈,植被覆蓋度低的中低地形位區段,低風險和較低風險等級的優勢分佈區間主要為林草廣佈、植被覆蓋度高的中高地形位區段;研究時段內生態風險有所緩和,但是中等風險增加,分佈範圍嚮更高的地形位擴展,高和較高生態風險的分佈範圍仍廣汎。應針對不同地形位梯度上的生態風險區,加彊資源利用規劃,閤理開髮和利用自然資源,降低不閤理生產活動與榦擾的生態風險,因地製宜,進行生態建設和人類活動管控,促進甘肅省南部山區的可持續髮展。
이감숙성백룡강류역1990,2002,2010년토지이용수거화30 m분변솔DEM위기출,기우경관격국지수、생태배경취약도、지형위지수급분포지수개전백룡강류역지형위제도상적생태풍험연구。결과표명:20년간경관생태풍험적수평분포격국발생료일정개변,저、교저화중등풍험구적범위확대,고화교고풍험구적범위축소;고풍험、교고풍험화중등풍험등급적우세분포구간주요위인위활동간우극렬,식피복개도저적중저지형위구단,저풍험화교저풍험등급적우세분포구간주요위림초엄포、식피복개도고적중고지형위구단;연구시단내생태풍험유소완화,단시중등풍험증가,분포범위향경고적지형위확전,고화교고생태풍험적분포범위잉엄범。응침대불동지형위제도상적생태풍험구,가강자원이용규화,합리개발화이용자연자원,강저불합리생산활동여간우적생태풍험,인지제의,진행생태건설화인류활동관공,촉진감숙성남부산구적가지속발전。
Based on 1990, 2002 and 2010 land-use data and 30 meters’ resolution DEM of Bailongjiang Watershed that incorporated a landscape index, a study of the ecological vulnerability, terrain niche index and distribution index was put forward to assess the characteristics of ecological risks on the terrain niche gradient. The results showed that in the past twenty years the distribution patterns of landscape ecological risks have changed, of which the scopes of the lower, low and medium ecological risks expended and that of the high and higher ecological risks narrowed. The dominant terrain niche zone of high, higher and medium ecological risks was in a low terrain section, where frequent human activities were intense and vegetation coverage very low, while the dominant terrain niche zone of the lower and low ecological risks was in a high section where trees and grass were widely distributed and vegetation coverage very high. During the research period, the ecological risks in the study area were eased, but the medium ecological risks increased, and extended to a higher terrain niche gradient, and higher ecological risk distribution was widespread. Integrated management of ecological risks should be taken according to the ecological risk on different terrain gradients. It is necessary to aim at different ecological risk levels in different terrain gradients, enhance the planning of natural resources and rational devel-opment and utilization of resources to reduce the ecological risks and hazards of irrational human disturbance.