创伤外科杂志
創傷外科雜誌
창상외과잡지
JOURNAL OF AUMATIC SURGERY
2014年
6期
520-523
,共4页
黄轶晖%洪潮%顾小华%余翔%胡洪奎
黃軼暉%洪潮%顧小華%餘翔%鬍洪奎
황질휘%홍조%고소화%여상%호홍규
跟骨骨折%移位%钢板
跟骨骨摺%移位%鋼闆
근골골절%이위%강판
calcaneus fractures%displacement plate
目的:对比解剖型钢板和锁定钢板治疗有移位的跟骨骨折的临床疗效。方法选取作者医院骨伤科2011年6月~2013年6月70例因有移位的跟骨骨折( SandersⅡ~Ⅳ型)患者,随机分为锁定钢板组(n=35)和解剖钢板组(n=35)进行内固定治疗。比较两组患者的手术时间和骨折愈合时间,手术前后的Bohler和Gissane角,手术前后的跟骨长度、高度和宽度。术后半年采用Maryland评分标准对跟骨功能进行评价,同时随访半年记录并发症发生情况。结果锁定钢板组的手术时间和骨折愈合时间较解剖钢板组显著缩短(P<0.01);两组患者术后1周的Bohler和Gissane角均显著大于术前(P<0.01);锁定钢板组术后1周的Bohler和Gissane角均显著大于解剖钢板组(P<0.01);两组患者术后1周的跟骨长度、高度均显著大于术前,而跟骨宽度显著小于术前( P<0.01);锁定钢板组术后1周的跟骨长度、高度均显著大于解剖钢板组,而跟骨宽度显著小于解剖钢板组( P<0.05);锁定钢板组的优良率显著高于解剖钢板组,χ2=4.8837,P=0.0271<0.05;两组患者的术后并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论对于有移位的跟骨骨折,锁定钢板的临床疗效更佳。
目的:對比解剖型鋼闆和鎖定鋼闆治療有移位的跟骨骨摺的臨床療效。方法選取作者醫院骨傷科2011年6月~2013年6月70例因有移位的跟骨骨摺( SandersⅡ~Ⅳ型)患者,隨機分為鎖定鋼闆組(n=35)和解剖鋼闆組(n=35)進行內固定治療。比較兩組患者的手術時間和骨摺愈閤時間,手術前後的Bohler和Gissane角,手術前後的跟骨長度、高度和寬度。術後半年採用Maryland評分標準對跟骨功能進行評價,同時隨訪半年記錄併髮癥髮生情況。結果鎖定鋼闆組的手術時間和骨摺愈閤時間較解剖鋼闆組顯著縮短(P<0.01);兩組患者術後1週的Bohler和Gissane角均顯著大于術前(P<0.01);鎖定鋼闆組術後1週的Bohler和Gissane角均顯著大于解剖鋼闆組(P<0.01);兩組患者術後1週的跟骨長度、高度均顯著大于術前,而跟骨寬度顯著小于術前( P<0.01);鎖定鋼闆組術後1週的跟骨長度、高度均顯著大于解剖鋼闆組,而跟骨寬度顯著小于解剖鋼闆組( P<0.05);鎖定鋼闆組的優良率顯著高于解剖鋼闆組,χ2=4.8837,P=0.0271<0.05;兩組患者的術後併髮癥髮生率無顯著差異(P>0.05)。結論對于有移位的跟骨骨摺,鎖定鋼闆的臨床療效更佳。
목적:대비해부형강판화쇄정강판치료유이위적근골골절적림상료효。방법선취작자의원골상과2011년6월~2013년6월70례인유이위적근골골절( SandersⅡ~Ⅳ형)환자,수궤분위쇄정강판조(n=35)화해부강판조(n=35)진행내고정치료。비교량조환자적수술시간화골절유합시간,수술전후적Bohler화Gissane각,수술전후적근골장도、고도화관도。술후반년채용Maryland평분표준대근골공능진행평개,동시수방반년기록병발증발생정황。결과쇄정강판조적수술시간화골절유합시간교해부강판조현저축단(P<0.01);량조환자술후1주적Bohler화Gissane각균현저대우술전(P<0.01);쇄정강판조술후1주적Bohler화Gissane각균현저대우해부강판조(P<0.01);량조환자술후1주적근골장도、고도균현저대우술전,이근골관도현저소우술전( P<0.01);쇄정강판조술후1주적근골장도、고도균현저대우해부강판조,이근골관도현저소우해부강판조( P<0.05);쇄정강판조적우량솔현저고우해부강판조,χ2=4.8837,P=0.0271<0.05;량조환자적술후병발증발생솔무현저차이(P>0.05)。결론대우유이위적근골골절,쇄정강판적림상료효경가。
Objective To compare the effect of anatomical plate and locking plate for displaced calcaneus fractures.Methods Totally 70 cases of displaced calcaneal fractures (Sanders II-IV type) in our department from Jun.2011 to Jun.2013 were selected and randomly divided into anatomical plate group ( n=35) and locking plate group (n=35).The two groups were compared in operative time and fracture healing time ,Bohler and Gissane an-gle before and after surgery as well as heel length ,height and width of the calcaneus before and after surgery .Mary-land score was adopted to evaluate the function of the calcaneus after six months , and the follow-up complications were recorded.Results The operation time and fracture healing time were significantly shorter in the locking plate group than those in the anatomical plate group (P<0.01).The Bohler and Gissane angle in both groups one week after surgery were significantly greater than those before surgery (P<0.01).Bohler and Gissane angle in the loc-king plate group one week after the surgery were significantly greater than those in the anatomical plate group ( P<0.01 ) .Postoperative heel length and height of the calcaneus in both groups were significantly higher than those be -fore surgery, while the width of the calcaneus was lower (P<0.01).Postoperative heel length and height of the calcaneus in the locking plate group were significantly higher than those in the anatomical plate group , while the width of the calcaneus was lower (P<0.01).The excellent and good rate of locking plate group was significantly higher than that of the anatomical plate group (χ2 =4.8837,P=0.0271<0.05).The incidence of the postopera-tive complications of patients in the two groups had no significant difference ( P>0.05 ) . Conclusion For dis-placed calcaneus fractures ,locking plate has better clinical efficacy .